Energy?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s physics 
Sujet : Energy?
De : ram (at) *nospam* zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 28. Jul 2024, 10:37:36
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Stefan Ram
Message-ID : <Energy-20240728103722@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
  In a chapter of a book, the author gives this relation for a
  system with mass m = 0:

E^2/c^2 = p^"3-vector" * p^"3-vector"

  . Then he writes, "This implies that either there is no particle
  at all, E = 0, or we have a particle, E <> 0, and therefore
  p^'3-vector' <> 0.".

  So, his intention is to kind of prove that a particle without mass
  must have momentum.

  But I wonder: Does "E = 0" really mean, "there is no particle."?

  300 years ago, folks would have said, "m = 0" means that there is
  no particle! Today, we know that there are particles with no mass.

  Can we be confident that "E = 0" means "no particle", or could there
  be a particle with "E = 0"?

  Here's the Unicode:

E²/c² = p⃗ · p⃗

  and

|This implies that either there is no particle at all, E = 0, or we
|have a particle, E ≠ 0, and therefore p⃗ ≠ 0.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
23 Dec 24 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal