Re: [SR] Usefulness of real velocities in accelerated relativistic frames of reference.

Le 14/03/2024 à 15:02, "Paul B. Andersen" a écrit :

The subject line is:
"SR: Usefulness of real velocities in accelerated relativistic frames of reference."
 I take this to mean that you are stating what you claim SR predicts.
 

 Above all, we must prioritize experimentation.
And if two theories face each other, we must take the one which has the approval of the experimenters.

 Indeed.
And you know of course that SR is confirmed by innumerable
experiments and falsified by none.
Some of them:
https://paulba.no/paper/index.html
 But the issue is:
Does SR predict what you claim it predicts?

Here is the problem:
We now know that Newtonian physics is out of the running, and that we must use a relativistic theory.
This is certain, and the evidence is so abundant that no one disputes it anymore, except a few crazy people.
But here we have, face to face, two ways of seeing the SR.
That of Einstein and Minkowski, and that of Hachel and Aspect.
Both theories predict the same things.
Except that Einstein and Minkowski's theory is ridiculous and contradictory on paper (internal imperfection), and that it is contradicted by the non-locality experiment (external refutation).
I am the only one to propose a coherent theory, theoretically unassailable and flawless, and with all the experiments on my side (including the instantaneous longitudinal transmission of information and the impossibility of transverse transmissions greater than c).
R.H.