Sujet : Re: Einstein's Mistakes
De : r.hachel (at) *nospam* liscati.fr.invalid (Richard Hachel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 26. Oct 2024, 12:35:05
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <VEEsPfE0jSLHLIsdI6WRvMrDWaU@jntp>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Nemo/1.0
Le 26/10/2024 à 10:19,
nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) a écrit :
Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> wrote:
On 2024-10-24 21:42:00 +0000, J. J. Lodder said:
Paul B. Andersen <relativity@paulba.no> wrote:
The problem with using just initials that two crackpots can have the same ones. At first reading I thought you meant "Dr" Hachel, who is indeed completely clueless about many things, but I was puzzled as I didn't think he had contributed to this thread.
Sorry, I didn't pay attention. I try to focus on content, if any.
To the point: do you have grounds for supposing one RH to be more
clueless about the general state of physics than the other one is?
Jan
If someone tells you: "The Beatles didn't know how to compose", or "Victor Hugo didn't know how to write", or "Eddy Merckx didn't know how to ride a bike", be wary of his mental capacities.
If someone tells you "Doctor Hachel is perfectly ignorant in physics", weigh his words on a scale, before swallowing them.
It's more rational than throwing words into the air, without knowing, without understanding what is said, and simply to show off.
R.H.