Re: Space and spacetime

Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 22.06.2024 o 15:54, gharnagel pisze:

>
Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
You're pretending even stupider
than you are to dodge.

 No matter how many times Wozzie tells lies, i doesn't
make them true.  His parents must be chagrinned at
his abysmal behavior.

>
And why won't you stop your iditic dodging
and answer what are the prediction of the moronic
physics of your moronic guru for my example?

Wozzie "question" was "What does an observer going at
c/2 through the solar system measure as the length of
a day?"
Since the observer is not on earth, a "day" is not well
defined.  I asked him if it was a day on earth, Mars,
Jupiter, what?  Also, since velocity is relative, what is
the c/s with respect to?  Autistic Wozzie-fool has refused
to answer these pertinent questions, proving his dishonesty
by asking stupid and irrelevant questions in return:

You must define "clearly and honestly". And "define".
And "must".

 Such terms are human terms, and those that are fully human
understand them implicitly.  Terms like "speed" and "time"

>
are the terms of physicists, i.e. Gods.
I'm getting it.

??  Wozzie makes no sense, as usual.
Then he pivots to a different question:

So, according to you and your idiot gurus -
in LET every observer, stationary in ether or not -
would observe light moving at speed c. Right?

>
What's the matter, mathematically-incompetent Wozzie,
can't actually USE the theory and calculate the answer
for yourself?

And dishonest Wozzie projects his incompetence on others:
And then he pivots to a third question:
"Is the RELATIVISTIC formula of velocity adding a part of
Lorentz's ETHER theory?  Yes or no"
So it's become quite confusing just which question Wozzie
wants answered.

The matter is that mathematically-incompetent Harrie
can't actually USE the theory and calculate the answer
for me.

 I offered to derive the LTE for Wozzie,

>
But can't deal with a set of assumptions
different than The Shit of your idiot guru.
It's not very complicated, but - well -
you're an idiot.

Wozzie-liar is projecting again.

A lie, of course. First - Lorentz invented his
equations for his ether theory,  then - your
idiot guru came with his absurd postulates.

 So the "absurd" postulates result in the LTE  exactly as
Lorentz invented them out of whole cloth, so how could they
possibly be absurd

>
Simply.

Yes, Wozzie is a simpleton.

Unlike the Holy Postulates,  told your
idiot gurus by Nature itself when She
spoke to them. Right, Harrie?

 Postulates are human constructs also, but they can be tested
against [nature].

>
Only such an idiot can believe and repeat such
an absurd lie.

So Wozzie denies that human constructs (like the constancy of the
speed of light) can't be tested against nature?  What is the matter
with this demented fool?

But - see: 0 meridian has something in common with both The Shit
of  your idiot guru and Lorontz ether theory, after all...

So Wozzie believes that 0 meridian is a fundamental property of
nature, like the speed of light?  This moron has gone totally off
the rails.  Python, call that nurse NOW!