Re: "Time" vs "physical time"

Le 06/08/2024 à 10:02, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

When a real person in the real world
says "time" - he/she doesn't refer
to your mystical crap at all. The
word usually means one of zone times
or UTC; TAI is referred rarely, but it
is still important. NONE of them is
observer dependent.
 That's why The Shit is opposed so
fiercely by "laymen". Whet they
refer as "time" simply doesn't
have those absurd properties invented
by your idiot guru for pseudotime he
liked.

I don't understand what you're saying.
Of course, solar time depends on the person's location
on the globe, and on a solar clock, it's not the same time in Paris and in Amsterdam.
But where I think you're making a mistake is when you think that we can adjust this with a universal clock, independent of the sun, and which would give a universal time.
This conception is false, and any clock can only give a local time.
If I take even Romeo and Juliet, sitting on two different benches, in the same schoolyard. They look at each other, they make little signs to each other. Suddenly Romeo sends a little beep on Juliet's cell phone.
Human thought is formatted in such a way that the moment when Romeo beeps is the same for both speakers, that is to say that this moment is in a sort of "universal present", a "plan of universal present time".
This vision of the world is completely false.
But the prejudice is so ingrained that anyone who says otherwise will be massacred by the tribe of monkeys that constitute humanity, and who are incapable of peeing without disgorging the toilet bowl.
R.H.