Re: Spacetime

>
W dniu 04.07.2024 o 18:39, gharnagel pisze:

>
Thomas Heger wrote:

>
But I tried to show, that the particle concept itself is wrong.

>
I don't think it's possible to disprove either concept.
>

So, matter needs to be 'relativistic' and made from absolutely

nothing.

>
Well, the quantum foam idea allows that, but the existence of such
matter doesn't last long.  I think that disproves that durable matter
can come from nothing.
>

I had an idea for this to become possible. I just take spacetime of

GR

for real and assume, that spacetime would consist of kind of

'pointlike

elements'.
>
That is something like a point with features and higher dimensions

than

points in Euclidean space have.

>
Frankly, I tend to disbelieve in the concept of spacetime.
>

These 'elements' are connceted multiplicative 'sideways', like a

certain

equation for quaternions, which is used for rotations.
>
This concept is my own invention, called 'structured spacetime' and
needs no strings.
>
It is actually relatively simple and needs only very few unusual
assumptions.
>
One unusual assumption is: points may have features and more than

three

dimensions.

>
I think points are nonexistent.  They are a mental invention to

express

geometrical concepts, just like numbers were invented to express
mathematical
concepts.

>
Like numbers - nonexistent, right, Har, poor halfbrain?