Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics

In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

On Mon, 14 Jul 2025 2:02:55 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
 

In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

On Sun, 13 Jul 2025 23:45:25 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>

In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

On Fri, 4 Jul 2025 22:19:05 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>

>
<snip old stuff>
>

        Arindam dismisses cloud chamber evidence —

>
It has nothing to do with Nature. Just an artificial construct at best.
So yes, that evidence is irrelevant. Nothing as relevant as Arindam's
rail gun experiments showing inertia violation.

>
You mean your low speed pipe roller that you are so proud of that you
have never written it up as text Arindam?

>
Arindam has done much better than that. He had provided crystal clear
video evidence with full explanations. That is a new way of providing
scientific truth. It is understandable to everyone. Schoolchildren in
particular with uncorrupted minds.

>
Youtube videos of your feet do not constitute documentation Arindam.
>

>
As it is incontrovertible it has to be ignored or demeaned by the vested
interests.
>
WOOF woof woof-woof woof woof-woof
>
Bertietaylor

>
Unlike your low speed pipe roller, it has been trivial to find detailed
instructions on how to build one since it's invention in 1911.

>
Can one make it for $1000 which is the equipment cost of Arindam's
apparatus? Can one make it work in one's garage or living room?

>
Yes and if you payed $1,000 for that pipe roller you got ripped off big
time Arindam.

 
The super capacitors cost hundreds and then there are chargers, cameras,
rollers, copper, wood, fasteners, power supply for charging,
multimeters, workshop equipment, brass cylinder, computers for
analysis...
 
You have no clue of even the most elementary costing. Your attempts to
pull down Arindam's work show desperation.

If you payed $1,000 for that pipe roller you are a piss poor shopper and
haven't a clue what you are doing.

Since there is no equipment to gather data, why would you need a
computer to do analysis at all much less computerS Arindam?

>
Scientific American in The Amateur Scientist column of April 1956
published the plans for a DIY cloud chamber.
>
Most of the parts were junkyard bits and pieces and cost next to nothing
to procure even in 1956 dollars Arindam.

 
Who cares for ancient history.

You asked if a cloud chamber could be DIY and less than $1000.

I gave you lots of examples of such for under $100.

Why are you ranting over your question being answered Arindam?

<snip ranting>

--
penninojim@yahoo.com