Re: Langevin's paradox again

Le 11/07/2024 à 14:36, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :

Den 11.07.2024 02:02, skrev Richard Hachel:

Yet B ages 9.18 years while A ages 22.63 y.

 Which is the only result SR can give.

 Not mine.

 

 That's not what I find.
Tr=11.155 years
To=23,544 years.

 Quite.
We know that your "theory" is falsified and gives the wrong results.

 No. Not MINE. 

SR is however thoroughly tested and never falsified.

 And MINE?

If you claim SR is wrong, you better give reference
to an experiment which falsify SR.
 

 Absolutely.
 But I already told you, SR as taught has no chance of being true. NONE. Because it inevitably contains a paradox (the Langevin paradox in apparent speeds). I explained why, but we don't WANT to understand, because that would call too much into question. It is therefore very little useful to carry out experiments on what she says, since in any case, it is dead from the start by simple theoretical evidence. We must therefore go further, and see if what I say (and which is infinitely coherent if we master the concepts) is experimentally true.
R.H.