Sujet : Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?
De : volney (at) *nospam* invalid.invalid (Volney)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 31. Mar 2024, 14:33:03
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <uubomg$1qajh$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 3/31/2024 8:23 AM, Richard Hachel wrote:
Le 31/03/2024 à 14:07, "Paul B. Andersen" a écrit :
Den 30.03.2024 14:31, skrev Richard Hachel:
SR is a consistent theory.
No.
Special Relativity is incapable of approving what Richard Hachel says,
Since experiment agrees with special relativity, it's obvious that Richard Hachel is wrong.
If Richard Hachel says: "The apparent speed of an object moving at 0.8c, it is 4c, if the object is moving towards me". They answer: "No, we know it's true, but if you say it, because you're scum, they'll say it's not true."
We perform an experiment to test this to see if SR or Richard Hachel is correct, and we find that SR is correct and Richard Hachel is wrong.
All this enters into madness on their part, but into the most intelligent of madness, that of hatred and massive refutation.
All this to block the way for anyone who says: “Hachel is right, and 9*4=36”.
So far, no experiment has been done where one could correctly state "Hachel is right and SR is wrong." Although Hachel is correct when he states 9*4=36, but that is not inconsistent with SR, of course.
…