Re: Space and spacetime

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s physics 
Sujet : Re: Space and spacetime
De : r.hachel (at) *nospam* wanadou.fr (Richard Hachel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 15. Jun 2024, 23:57:11
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <w0fF3cTi6yGH5F-pDMYGxAkwnUQ@jntp>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Nemo/0.999a
Le 15/06/2024 à 23:34, Python a écrit :
Laisse Maciej tranquille.
 Why? By the way what's your opinion about his argument on
the definition of a second back in Einstein's times and now?
 
Il se trompe certes sur le fait que t'=t.
 Neither you or him could even explain what it would mean
anyway.
 
Mais il est moins bouffon que toi.
 T'euh qu'un guignol!
 T'euh même pas capab' de comprendre des évidence telles que Vapp=v/(1+cosµ.v/c)
 There is nothing obvious there.
The very formula I have derived and you never did? :-D
 
Même Maciej il le comprend...
 I doubt it. Ask him.
Yes, but at this price, something strange is evident.
You keep repeating: "Hachel is a joke, you should definitely not think that he is not a big dick in the whole history of humanity, he is not a three-time Nobel Prize winner, he knows nothing in sociology, nothing in medicine, nothing in theology, nothing in relativistic physics, etc...."
Then you say: “he is capable of nothing”.
Then you take an equation and say:
Vapp=v/(1+cosµ.v/c) it's good, I checked it, but it's not his.
Because if it was him, it would be fake.
This all turns grotesque.
Okay, will you try your page on apparent speeds? There is Paul B. Andersen who attempted one which I skimmed from afar (because I cannot read English quickly), I do not see why by repeating what he says, what I say, and what you said on the subject,
you couldn't make a two or three page pdf.
R.H.
Date Sujet#  Auteur
5 Oct 24 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal