Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s physics 
Sujet : Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.
De : banerjeeadda1234 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Arindam Banerjee)
Groupes : sci.physics sci.physics.electromag sci.physics.relativity
Date : 29. Apr 2024, 08:02:39
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <HHc5lr4VT4FGMSRGYS4Izb9vxug@jntp>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Nemo/0.999a
Le 29/04/2024 à 13:24, bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) a écrit :
Jim Pennino wrote:
 
In sci.physics.electromag bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
Jim Pennino wrote:
 
In sci.physics.electromag bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
Ross Finlayson wrote:
 
On 04/25/2024 01:05 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
 
Einstein's theories are pure nonsense. They depend upon the constancy of
the speed of light, which is wrong. Light speed actually varies with the
speed of the emitter. Then the optical effect of refraction was abused
to make it appear that the Sun bent the light from the stars. His
theories led to the concept of a finite but expanding universe. Now
Hubble and Webb telescopes show an infinite universe, with distant
galaxies NOT moving away at high speeds but going in all directions.
 
I'm sort of a fan of this guy: https://www.deltaveng.com/ .
He demonstrates some coilguns he put together with off-the-shelf parts.
 Coilguns are not railguns. Totally different technologies.
Arindam invented a new type of railgun with parallel rails spread wide apart, heavy armature and low voltage requirement with low reistance for high currents.
That design has been stolen by the US Navy and employed in its most modern ships.
 
Wrong on oh so many counts.
 
After 15 years and $500 million in research, the US Navy gave up on
railguns in 2021.
 
Railguns were never deployed on Navy ships other than for testing.
 The photo of their new barrel based on Arindam's new design is on Arindam's Facebook timeline. On 10 March. It shows clearly twin barrels and mentions 500 million dollars. Trials are going on.
 
Nope, totally shut down in 2021.
 Must have been restarted after CIA found out about Arindam's new design.
Anyway the photo of the gun is there on 10 Mar2024, posted all over facebook.
Difficult to hide the barrel of a large gun, what.
The US thieves can steal his book (The Son of Hiranyaksh)  and give nocredit to Arindam for his new approach in software - a filing system for efficient searches back in 1987 -  that made googling possible and so many other starts.
But this theft they cannot hide.
Will provide details later.  Woof-woof
 bt (Arindam's best friends)
check out
https://jet.usnews.uk/?id=545&fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTAAAR2ZS3uD00kpCfEF9cXpwFjtTPwLbPC0yaZ5ecM4ro18FzchEc6DI3X0shI_aem_ASTw-3t5knNcOBuSOGUvpicbb2P6IBUteSF8f6gHV63bt9m1VNPux7o4IKsPZmi1jFIqfCAK4ql33Oak-J15E2Ld
From above link:
The United States recently tested its highly advanced $500 million rail gun, showcasing its devastating power and precision. This revolutionary weapon utilizes electromagnetic technology to launch projectiles at incredibly high speeds, surpassing the capabilities of traditional artillery systems. The test demonstrated the rail gun's immense destructive potential, with projectiles traveling at velocities exceeding Mach 6 and hitting targets with pinpoint accuracy over extended distances. The footage captured during the test revealed the incredible force and velocity of the projectiles as they pierced through solid steel targets with ease. The successful test marks a significant advancement in military technology, highlighting the US military's commitment to developing cutting-edge weapons systems to maintain its superiority on the battlefield. The rail gun's exceptional power and precision make it a formidable asset for future military operations, reshaping the landscape of modern warfare.
PROMOTED CONTENT
See the photo there of the barrel?
Compare that with the barrel in Arindam's rail gun videos, which go back to 2015 when Arindam invented it for his PhD project in RMIT Melbourne. CIA has links everywhere, they are supposed to be intelligent after all, so this is how they get their keep.
At least, Arindam's friends know what is what.  T
https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=122108682710231884&set=a.122093944226231884
shows Arindam's reaction to his claim of inventing it to the world, while from his facebook page:
https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359/
Comments from two of my friends are:
You stand vindicated! That itself is the greatest of satisfaction. God bless you and your dedication in search of truth. Congratulations!
It's been the same since man invented the first invention. Some reap the harvest, some stand by and watch. Many of us are like trees who can't eat their fruits. That's why the word detachment. However the fruits due would be savored in due course in the births to come. Because the outcome due can be delayed not denied. Don't know if you could have been at peace and happier with billions in your store or as you are now. Congrats big bro for some stupendous work.
My reply to above:
My original intention was to make reactionless motors with it. But it could launch satellites in space, used for horizontal drilling and of course be used as the most powerful gun ever launching missiles at supersonic speeds which after getting launched would with normal rocket action gain hypersonic speeds. A most deadly weapon. Useful to destroy asteroids or mine them. Well electromagnetic launch of aircraft is certainly possible with say a million amps of current going down the rails and through some connecting bar to the aircraft. My PhD work was about this with the first paper published in 2013. First such model made in 2015 and detailed YouTube videos in 2017. So they had enough time to appropriate my original idea of a heavy armature low voltage extremely efficient rail gun whose entire details are in the 2017 videos. Now I expect commercial planes to take off and land similarly. Plenty of fuel and space saving, then. Cheers, Arindam.
To which one of my oldest friends wrote:
you are a wasted talent.The greatest from our Seniour Cambridge clas of 1972.Until and unless your fight. Why crib. I don't like cribbers
and my reply was
 am not cribbing. True I do not have worthy or good friends, who would help that is, but what to do, the typical groveling-jealous-corrupt slave-colonial-bunnyah attitude I do not have, being brought up in India by the Anglo/British teachers at my primary school, then by the Soviets in the commune where I lived in my tender years, and of course the Jesuit Catholics! Also, the Arya doctrine of nishkaama karma which I was taught by my Bihari tutor, helps me a lot. (Meaning, action without desire for the results - doing good for its own sake, with faith in the Lord.) In this thread am stating what is what, and being glad that I can do that, thanks to Facebook. I think I am much more than just a good student at school. There are millions like that! No big deal. As for my contributions: I designed military primary and IFF radar and other antennas for BEL; out of a sense of duty wrote some print published articles that changed India's destiny from a poor country with no hope under the socialist regime to what it is now; for my M.Tech invented a new filing system that led to what is now known as googling, and that work was accelerated by my work in Australia; followed that up by the international standardisation works related to computer security (enabling online transactions) and then the dimensioning of CCS7 signalling network (whose effect is very few busy tones, texting, etc.). Followed that by improving the queuing theory and applying that to various industries, from call centres to banking to roads - wherever there is delay. Which makes life in Australia a breeze - no delays anywhere. All smooth. And I find, now in India as well! In TRL I was best known for a new kind of simulation program, that optimised the parameters of a complex call centre network. That helped to make call centres take off. I even got some mentions for that! Then when I was a contractor for Telstra I wrote a program that improved the nervous system of robots by improved message passing... as I suspected, clever drones are the result. Sad. But, there will be robots doing lots of work in space one day with such a message passing software. Well, I got paid for all the above, meaning I initiated (usually on a trouble-shooting basis) what others followed up and made billions from. Or in the case of India, improved national security. That way I am one among a few thousand initiators, globally. Nothing much. But it takes the greatest genius of all time to invent the HTN, Internal Force Engine, upset the wrong Einsteinian theories, etc. And this is only science and technology, which practically no one can understand. What those around me do understand are my cooking and acting skills, while my personal joys are my writings and family life. Sorry to appear to boast a bit, and I do know that I may sound like Baron Munchausen. Unlike the good baron, evidence is there for all my claims. Now as for fighting, one has to understand the enemy. What is it. If the enemy is too strong, do not fight. Relax, don't get hurt. Conserve your strength, depend upon the Gods and Goddesses, the great spirits mortal and immortal for guidance. So now I am engaged in various projects, while being as happy as possible. Whether my projects work out or not, Ieave to the Higher Powers That Be. In this case, I am glad that like googling, my work on the new railguns are being put to use. Inventing googling led to my posting my literary works online, whereas earlier I would write my poems on paper, then tear that up and let the winds blow it all away. Charming, that, in its way, but futile maybe.
and Just saying that I don't think I have wasted my talents. They are too rich, so they all avoid. Difficult to do much with billion or trillion dollar notes in your pocket, what! No change possible even when considered genuine, so no services or goods are available! Giveaway is the best course.
****
One cannot help it if one like myself is a Brahmin, that is, one who worships the Goddess Saraswati, Whose treasures only increase by their giving away free and full; so I do appear strange to the bunny-ahs in our bunny-ah world.  Ah well.  Prajapatirhishirnyushtupacchanday, que sera sera, whatever will be will be, the future's not ours to see...
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee

Date Sujet#  Auteur
25 Apr 24 * Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.47Arindam Banerjee
25 Apr 24 +* Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.2Jim Pennino
25 Apr 24 i`- Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.1bertietaylor
25 Apr 24 `* Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.44Arindam Banerjee
25 Apr 24  +* Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.22Jim Pennino
25 Apr 24  i`* Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.21Obed Erdélyi
25 Apr 24  i +- Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.1Jim Pennino
25 Apr 24  i `* Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.19Ross Finlayson
26 Apr 24  i  +* Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.17Arindam Banerjee
26 Apr 24  i  i`* Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.16Jim Pennino
26 Apr 24  i  i `* Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.15bertietaylor
26 Apr 24  i  i  +* Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.6Jim Pennino
26 Apr 24  i  i  i+- Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.1Jesee Takenouchi
27 Apr 24  i  i  i+- Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.1bertietaylor
28 Apr 24  i  i  i+* Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.2Minamoto Sakakibara
28 Apr 24  i  i  ii`- Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.1Jim Pennino
29 Apr 24  i  i  i`- Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.1Justus Bakó Sárosi
27 Apr 24  i  i  `* Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.8Physfitfreak
27 Apr 24  i  i   +* Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.6Jim Pennino
27 Apr 24  i  i   i`* Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.5Ross Finlayson
27 Apr 24  i  i   i `* Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.4Arindam Banerjee
27 Apr 24  i  i   i  `* Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.3Jim Pennino
28 Apr 24  i  i   i   `* Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.2bertietaylor
28 Apr 24  i  i   i    `- Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.1Jim Pennino
27 Apr 24  i  i   `- Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.1bertietaylor
26 Apr 24  i  `- Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.1Bognár Zachariah Pálinkás
25 Apr 24  `* Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.21Ross Finlayson
28 Apr 24   `* Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.20bertietaylor
28 Apr 24    `* Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.19Jim Pennino
28 Apr 24     +- Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.1Ross Finlayson
29 Apr 24     `* Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.17bertietaylor
29 Apr 24      `* Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.16Jim Pennino
29 Apr 24       +* Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.12bertietaylor
29 Apr 24       i+* Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.5Arindam Banerjee
29 Apr 24       ii`* Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.4Jim Pennino
30 Apr 24       ii +* Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.2bertietaylor
30 Apr 24       ii i`- Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.1Jim Pennino
1 May 24       ii `- Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.1bertietaylor
29 Apr 24       i`* Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.6Jim Pennino
2 May 24       i `* Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.5bertietaylor
2 May 24       i  `* Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.4Jim Pennino
3 May 24       i   `* Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.3bertietaylor
3 May 24       i    `* Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.2Jim Pennino
4 May 24       i     `- Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.1bertietaylor
2 May 24       `* Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.3bertietaylor
2 May 24        `* Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.2Jim Pennino
2 May 24         `- Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.1bertietaylor

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal