Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s physics 
Sujet : Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo
De : jimp (at) *nospam* gonzo.specsol.net (Jim Pennino)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity sci.physics
Date : 22. Sep 2024, 21:18:15
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <5la6sk-7edj.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : tin/2.6.2-20220130 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.0-122-generic (x86_64))
In sci.physics Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
W dniu 22.09.2024 o 21:02, Jim Pennino pisze:
In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 23:52:31 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>
In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 13:49:44 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>
In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 2:55:50 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>
In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Tue, 17 Sep 2024 11:19:24 +0000, bertietaylor wrote:
>
https://www.facebook.com/100000534193755/videos/350814810783223
>
All relevant links and details in
>
https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=12218&group=sci.physics#12218
>
Woof-woof
>
Bertietaylor (Arindam Banerjee's celestial cyberdogs)
>
Exposes the Einstein-Feynman electrodynamics as rubbish. Trashes all of
modern physics papers.
>
Now that will be some bonfire when all e=mcc documents are burnt.
>
How do you plan to spend your Nobel Prize money, crackpot?
>
Who cares for trifles, Penisnino? That too from those racist and bigoted
unscientific hypocrites. Arindam goes for quintillions worth of stuff
and over the centuries to come. Not counting the immense joy and
purpose...
>
Yeah, sure, Arindam.
>
Right for once, Penisnino.
>
Childish as usual, Arindam.
>
Child-like, Penisnino. Such is Arindam.
>
Childish is what you duped e=mcc chanting apes are. Disastrous chimps!
>
Woof-woof
>
Bertietaylor (Arindam's alternate personality)
 
Real experiments with real data since 1905 says
 
A lie, of course, real experiments are silent.
Brainwashed relativistic idiots, on the other
hand - always have a lot to say.
 
 
 
Einstein was correct and
 
And in the meantime in the real world - forbidden
by your mad church "improper" GPS and TAI
clocks keep measuring t'=t, just like all serious
clocks always did.
 

This is a steaming pile of insane crackpot babble.



Date Sujet#  Auteur
17 Sep 24 * Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo59bertietaylor
17 Sep 24 +* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo19Jim Pennino
18 Sep 24 i`* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo18bertietaylor
18 Sep 24 i `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo17Jim Pennino
18 Sep 24 i  `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo16bertietaylor
18 Sep 24 i   `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo15Jim Pennino
19 Sep 24 i    `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo14bertietaylor
19 Sep 24 i     `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo13Jim Pennino
19 Sep 24 i      +* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo6bertietaylor
19 Sep 24 i      i`* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo5Jim Pennino
19 Sep 24 i      i `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo4bertietaylor
20 Sep 24 i      i  `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo3Jim Pennino
20 Sep 24 i      i   `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo2bertietaylor
20 Sep 24 i      i    `- Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo1Jim Pennino
25 Sep 24 i      +- Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo1palsing
25 Sep 24 i      `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo5palsing
26 Sep 24 i       `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo4bertietaylor
26 Sep 24 i        `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo3Jim Pennino
26 Sep 24 i         +- Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo1bertietaylor
1 Oct 24 i         `- Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo1Maciej Wozniak
21 Sep 24 +* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo34bertietaylor
21 Sep 24 i`* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo33Jim Pennino
21 Sep 24 i `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo32bertietaylor
21 Sep 24 i  `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo31Jim Pennino
22 Sep 24 i   `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo30bertietaylor
22 Sep 24 i    `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo29Jim Pennino
22 Sep 24 i     `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo28bertietaylor
22 Sep 24 i      `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo27Jim Pennino
22 Sep 24 i       +* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo20Jim Pennino
23 Sep 24 i       i`* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo19Jim Pennino
23 Sep 24 i       i `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo18Jim Pennino
23 Sep 24 i       i  `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo17Jim Pennino
23 Sep 24 i       i   `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo16Maciej Wozniak
23 Sep 24 i       i    `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo15Jim Pennino
23 Sep 24 i       i     `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo14Maciej Wozniak
23 Sep 24 i       i      `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo13Jim Pennino
24 Sep 24 i       i       +* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo11bertietaylor
24 Sep 24 i       i       i`* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo10Jim Pennino
24 Sep 24 i       i       i +- Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo1bertietaylor
24 Sep 24 i       i       i `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo8ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
24 Sep 24 i       i       i  +- Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo1Maciej Wozniak
25 Sep 24 i       i       i  +* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo2Physfitfreak
25 Sep 24 i       i       i  i`- Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo1bertietaylor
25 Sep 24 i       i       i  `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo4J. J. Lodder
25 Sep 24 i       i       i   `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo3Athel Cornish-Bowden
25 Sep 24 i       i       i    `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo2Edward McGuire
26 Sep 24 i       i       i     `- Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo1Athel Cornish-Bowden
24 Sep 24 i       i       `- Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo1Maciej Wozniak
23 Sep 24 i       `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo6bertietaylor
23 Sep 24 i        `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo5Jim Pennino
23 Sep 24 i         `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo4bertietaylor
23 Sep 24 i          `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo3Jim Pennino
24 Sep 24 i           `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo2bertietaylor
25 Sep 24 i            `- Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo1bertietaylor
26 Sep 24 `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo5bertietaylor
26 Sep 24  `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo4Jim Pennino
26 Sep 24   `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo3bertietaylor
27 Sep 24    `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo2Jim Pennino
28 Sep 24     `- Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo1bertietaylor

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal