Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo

W dniu 23.09.2024 o 21:30, Jim Pennino pisze:

In sci.physics Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:

W dniu 23.09.2024 o 20:45, Jim Pennino pisze:

In sci.physics Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:

W dniu 23.09.2024 o 19:02, Jim Pennino pisze:

In sci.physics Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:

W dniu 23.09.2024 o 17:31, Jim Pennino pisze:
>

See, poor insane crackpot - I've proven the mumble
of your idiot  guru to be not even consistent, and
you can  do nothing about it apart of raving, spitting
and insulting.
But you will do what you can for your beloved
Shit and your beloved church.
>

Incoherent gibberish.
>

>
See, poor insane crackpot - I've proven the mumble
of your idiot  guru to be not even consistent, and
you can  do nothing about it apart of raving, spitting
and insulting.
But you will do what you can for your beloved
Shit and your beloved church.

   
Yet more incoherent gibberish.
>

>
See, poor insane crackpot - I've proven the mumble
of your idiot  guru to be not even consistent, and
you can  do nothing about it apart of raving, spitting
and insulting.
But you will do what you can for your beloved
Shit and your beloved church.
>
And - no experiment has ever said that the idiot
was correct, like many religious maniacs of all
kind - you're hearing voices.
>

>
And yet more incoherent gibberish.

>
See, poor insane crackpot - I've proven the mumble
of your idiot  guru to be not even consistent, and
you can  do nothing about it apart of raving, spitting
and insulting.
But you will do what you can for your beloved
Shit and your beloved church.
>
And - no experiment has ever said that the idiot
was correct, like many religious maniacs of all
kind - you're hearing voices.
>

 
And yet again, nothing but incoherent mental patient gibberish.
 

 
 
And yet again:
See, poor insane crackpot - I've proven