Re: ww3

On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 7:27:21 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:

Am Donnerstag000016, 16.01.2025 um 09:25 schrieb Bertietaylor:
....

Napoleon ranks with Alexander, Caesar and Hitler as among the four top
European leaders, for egalitarianism and modernity.

>
'egalitarianism' is apparently meant as 'socialism' and 'modernity' as
'technocracy' (which are the buzz words of the WEF).

More or less.

>
So 'the GREAT RESET' is actually the return of Caesar and the ancient
Rome.

Benevolent competent dictator adored by masses with increasing living
standards. Ideal.

>
Well, yes, possibly.
>
But who wants Rome back???

Rome is there in legal systems where theoretically only guilty are
punished with innocents not to be harmed.

>
Ancients Rome was a slaveholder society, where about two out of three
people were slaves.

Now we have machines that work better than slaves.

Since slave-ownership ranks among the unforgivable sins, all successions
of ancient Rome will be destroyed by God himself.

I thought Jews had their slaves but Jews are very much around.

>

All of them did essentially the same thing:
>
they have sent their armies into territories, which were not theirs and
forced the inhabitants of the occupied regions to fight in their army.
>
In case of Napoleon this was a disaster for the Prussians, which died in
large numbers in the Russian winter.
>
That stupid corsian piece of shit didn't do that, however, but left the
Prussians there to die together with the French soldiers.
>
Hitler did almost the same thing.
>
Hitlers occupation involved more serious crimes however, which were much
more devastating for the German soldiers.
>
E.g. Hitler refused to occupy Leningrad.
>
This was extremely stupid, because Leningrad has a harbor and having a
harbor there would allow the Wehrmacht to use ships (instead of walking
through the Russian winter).
>
To prevent German success, the Nazis had to surround Leningrad and
starved 1 million Russians to death, which was a very serious crime,
too.
>
But it was also extremely stupid, because with occupation of Leningrad
the Baltic Sea would have been entirely under German control.
>
That in turn would allow Navi-ships to move quite safely back and forth
and that in  turn would have saved millions of lifes.
>
>
Also the Stalingrad campaign was extremely stupid and extremely deadly.
>
It made not sense of any kind to invade that region in the first place.
>
But especially the city Stalingrad was of no particular interest and the
campaigned served no obvious purpose (despite wiping out an entire
army).
>
So: Hitler was a piece of shit, too, but for very similar reasons as
Napoleon.

>
Pale versions of Genghis Khan.

>
Well, that shithead lived much earlier, but was actually worse than
Napoleon and Hitler combined.

Those who gladly accepted his rule were spared.
Dear Genghis dragged Europe out of the Dark ages.
Religious bigots may not be happy about that.

....
>
TH