Re: ww3

On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 7:38:50 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:

Am Sonntag000019, 19.01.2025 um 11:35 schrieb Bertietaylor:

On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 7:27:21 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:
>

Am Donnerstag000016, 16.01.2025 um 09:25 schrieb Bertietaylor:
....

Napoleon ranks with Alexander, Caesar and Hitler as among the four top
European leaders, for egalitarianism and modernity.

>
'egalitarianism' is apparently meant as 'socialism' and 'modernity' as
'technocracy' (which are the buzz words of the WEF).

>
More or less.

>
So 'the GREAT RESET' is actually the return of Caesar and the ancient
Rome.

>
Benevolent competent dictator adored by masses with increasing living
standards. Ideal.

>
Most dictators in history started benevolant and ended, because they
left too many corpses behind.

Other way around, monarchs generally were wonderful dictators at least
in Hindu States. Elsewhere they fell short by varying lengths.

>

>
Well, yes, possibly.
>
But who wants Rome back???

>
Rome is there in legal systems where theoretically only guilty are
punished with innocents not to be harmed.

>
 >>>WAS<<<  !!!

Still is in theory.

>
Actually ancient Rome is long gone and has existed two thousand years
ago.
>
But many Roman principles of jurisdiction have stil survived and are
still in use today.

Yes.

>

Ancients Rome was a slaveholder society, where about two out of three
people were slaves.

>
Now we have machines that work better than slaves.
>

>
Slavery turned out to be very inefficinat.
So modern forms of slavery were introduced, where the slaves had to feed
themselves.

They feed billionaires.

>

Since slave-ownership ranks among the unforgivable sins, all successions
of ancient Rome will be destroyed by God himself.

>
I thought Jews had their slaves but Jews are very much around.

>
>
Well, possibly God is taking revenge now.

No, Jews' have it all save for minor hiccups here and there. Protestants
adore them.

>

All of them did essentially the same thing:
>
they have sent their armies into territories, which were not theirs and
forced the inhabitants of the occupied regions to fight in their army.
>

....

So: Hitler was a piece of shit, too, but for very similar reasons as
Napoleon.

>
Pale versions of Genghis Khan.

>
Well, that shithead lived much earlier, but was actually worse than
Napoleon and Hitler combined.

>
Those who gladly accepted his rule were spared.
Dear Genghis dragged Europe out of the Dark ages.
Religious bigots may not be happy about that.

>
I would say, that the Mongols had occuption in mind, when they came to
the west.

They were nomads clueless about civilisation.

>
Whether or not they wanted to bring enlightment to the people of the
'dark ages' would be a theoretical question, because they were defeated
by the people they have tried to enlighten.

Not the point. They shook up things.

>
TH