Re: The Orange One

In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

On Mon, 26 May 2025 15:17:12 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
 

In sci.physics bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

On Mon, 26 May 2025 4:45:34 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>

In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

On Sun, 25 May 2025 13:41:34 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>

In sci.physics bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

On Sun, 25 May 2025 13:06:16 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>

>
<snip huge pile of old crap>
>

Fact: Arindam had no instrumentation, which means no data, which means
he has no clue what actually happened in his so called experiment that
slowly rolled a pipe and nothing more.

>
Facts:

>
<snip huge pile of links to youtube videos with no list of
instrumentation>

>
Simple multimeter, video camera, self generated software, measuring and
weight scales are enough instrumentation for Arindam

>
Which means you don't have a clue as to the the dynamic voltage or
current nor do you have anything to measure acceleration.

>
A video camera with a scale is sufficient to show that the centre of
gravity accelerates with internal force.

>
Utter nonsense.
>
<snip delusional nonsense>
>

That was the point fool. To make a low voltage heavy armature gun making
a very low resistance circuit. That is what makes it a brilliant new
design, 100 times better than the old rail gun designs. Penisnino is
such an ass that he does not know that 6 supercapacitors in series
generate 6 times 2.7 volts or 16.2 Volts. Which when shorted give an
average current of nearly 3000 amperes, enough for the purpose. With
conventional rail gun design, the armature is light and the voltage is
very high.

>
More utter nonsense.

 
No, it is the height of sense.

>
With an applied voltage of 16.2 volts, the resistance would have to be
less than 0.0054 Ohms to get 3000 Amps. The actual resistance of such a
device is going to be in the range of somewhere between 0.1 and 0.5
Ohms,

 
It is actually in the order of millions typically 5 milliohms or 0.05
ohms.

And how could you possibly know that since it requires very special
equipment to measure milliohms?

but you have no way to know what it actually is as simple multimeters
can
not accurately measure resistences less than about 1 Ohm.

 
We are not checking the resistance with  meter. We are finding the
average current from the force and knowing the average voltage we are
finding it.

And how could you possibly know that since you have no equipment to
measure force even indirectly?

 
About direct calculation from resistive path. The main circuit is thick
copper with near zero resistance. The only resistance is at the contacts
which are low thanks to the heavy weight of the armature. The heavy
weight makes it a good short. Arindam spent years improving the contact
and indeed that is crucial for further development.

Utter nonsense as you have no equipment capable of measuring resistances
of less than an Ohm.

Check out the specs of the internal resistance of the super capacitors
from the manufacturer. The internal resistance is below one milliohm

Totally irrelevant to anything from above.

>
Trying to run a rail gun at low voltage is not something new or a new
discovery as the equations that describe the operation of a rail gun
have no limits on the applied voltage.

 
It is absolutely new as no one did it before. Arindam's experiment is
totally new as your consternation and ignorance show.

It has never been done because the equations that describe such an
apparatus clearly show using low voltage is blazingly stupid and you are
the first person stupid enough to do it.