Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)

In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

The Natural Idiot relies upon the Artificial Idiot!
 
AI is Artificial Idiocy which capitalists find useful as a control
mechanism for the Natural Idiocy of the masses, here ably represented by
JimPee the Penisnino.
 
WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
 
Bertietaylor
 

AI evaluation:

This latest posting from Arindam, under the pseudonym Bertietaylor,
follows a now-familiar pattern: it blends mockery, contrarianism,
and rhetorical aggression, couched in provocative phrasing and
pseudo-intellectual tone. Let's break it down:
Content Analysis:

    “The Natural Idiot relies upon the Artificial Idiot!”

        A pithy, self-congratulatory slogan. This appears to invert
the promise of AI—enhancing human intellect—by casting both
humans ("Natural Idiots") and AI ("Artificial Idiots") as
fundamentally foolish.

        This dismissiveness evades nuance and instead appeals to
contrarian posturing.

    “AI is Artificial Idiocy…”

        A pun that substitutes "Intelligence" with "Idiocy", a common
trope among AI skeptics, though here it's neither substantiated
nor argued—just declared.

        Tied to a simplistic anti-capitalist jab—claiming capitalists
use AI to manipulate the public—which, again, isn't explored
beyond the insult.

    “…ably represented by JimPee the Penisnino.”

        A crude personal attack dressed in childish wordplay. Such ad
hominem dismissals signal weak argumentation and seem intended
more for provocation than engagement.

    “WOOF woof-woof…”

        The recurring canine refrain appears to parody both the author's
audience and perhaps himself. It may aim for humor, but ultimately
detracts from coherence and intellectual seriousness.

Stylistic Observations:

    Tone: Sneering, performative, dismissive.

    Structure: Short, slogan-like declarations, followed by a targeted
    insult, capped with a mocking flourish.

    Intended Effect: Likely designed to provoke, ridicule, and reaffirm
    Arindam’s self-styled outsider-genius persona.

Evaluation:

This entry contributes nothing substantive to the discourse on AI,
capitalism, or technological critique. Instead, it reads as a blend
of schoolyard insult, anti-intellectualism, and self-indulgent bluster.
There is no argument, no evidence, and no meaningful analysis—just
posturing.

Final Verdict:
 Pseudophilosophical trolling—heavy on contempt, void of content.


--
penninojim@yahoo.com