Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sp relativity 
Sujet : Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)
De : relativity (at) *nospam* paulba.no (Paul.B.Andersen)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 02. Jul 2025, 18:20:24
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <1043po8$3keh3$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Den 01.07.2025 01:52, skrev Bertitaylor:
On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 18:18:47 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
 
Elements with 1 proton in the nucleus are Hydrogen
There are two stable isotopes:
 ¹H (Protium)     1 proton 0 neutrons
 ²H (D Deuterium) 1 proton 1 neutron
  ³H (T Tritium) 1 proton 2 neutrons
  Tritium is unstable with half-life 12.33 years.
  The decay mode is β−, which means that a neutron splits
  into a proton and an electron. The electron is ejected as β-rays.
  So we get a nucleus with 2 protons and and 1 neutron, which is
  ³He, the most abundant stable Helium isotope.
   The short half-life should indicate that T should not
  exist naturally, but it is created by interaction between
  cosmic rays and air. The natural abundance is however very low.
 But T can be artificially created in an atomic reactor.
T has several applications, among them are H-bombs.
 D and T combine very easily in fusion to ⁴He, a stable Helium isotope.
That's why the Hydrogen in a H-bomb is enriched with both D and T.
(Some, or all of the T can be created in the bombs itself from lithium.)
 An atomic bomb exploded on Earth can't create the temperature and
pressure to make H explode in a chain reaction. The enrichment
of D and T are necessary to make the bomb explode.
 Please answer my question:
>
Do you really think that Teller & al, would have succeeded
in making the H-bomb if they didn't know what I stated above
(and _much_ more)?
So the answer is "yes", Bertitaylor does indeed believe that
Teller & al would have succeeded in making the H-bomb even if
they had known nothing about Hydrogen, Deuterium and Tritium.
However, since they _did_ know what I have stated above, and much more,
about Hydrogen, Deuterium and Tritium they used a fission bomb around
a capsule with Deuterium and Tritium, and when the fission bomb went
off the pressure and temperature became so high that Deuterium and
Tritium was fused together in the fusion process:
    ²H+³H → ⁴He + n
D with 1 proton, 1 neutron + T with 1 proton, 2 proton 2 neutrons →
He with 2 protons, 2 neutrons + neutron + 17.6 MeV.
Most of the energy is kinetic energy of the ejected neutron.
D =  2.01410200 u
T =  3.01604928 u
------------------
      5.03015128 u
He = 4.002603254 U
n  = 1.008664916 U
------------------
      5.011268170
mass loss m = 0.01888310 u, E = mc²  = 17.589507 MeV

 They simply put heavy water around a fission bomb to split deuterium and
thus made what is called a hydrogen bomb, with protons snapping off with
incredible force and thus causing a chain reaction with objects hitting
each other and creating huge energies as per the creation of energy
formula by divine Arindam that he discovered in 1998.
Bertitaylor, I will not ask you if you really believe that Teller & al
could simply have put heavy water around a fission bomb to make a
H-bomb. Of course you don't. And you know they didn't.
Why do you pretend to believe what you know never happened?
Are you trolling?
--
Paul
https://paulba.no/

Date Sujet#  Auteur
25 Jun 25 * Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)40Jim Pennino
26 Jun 25 `* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)39bertitaylor
26 Jun 25  +- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Jim Pennino
26 Jun 25  `* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)37Paul.B.Andersen
26 Jun 25   +- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Lon Mahankov
27 Jun 25   +* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)34Bertitaylor
27 Jun 25   i+* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)16Chris M. Thomasson
27 Jun 25   ii+- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Chris M. Thomasson
27 Jun 25   ii`* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)14Chris M. Thomasson
27 Jun 25   ii `* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)13Bertitaylor
27 Jun 25   ii  +* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)7Chris M. Thomasson
28 Jun 25   ii  i`* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)6Bertitaylor
29 Jun 25   ii  i `* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)5Chris M. Thomasson
29 Jun 25   ii  i  `* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)4Bertitaylor
29 Jun 25   ii  i   `* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)3Chris M. Thomasson
29 Jun 25   ii  i    `* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)2Bertitaylor
4 Jul23:19   ii  i     `- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Chris M. Thomasson
27 Jun 25   ii  +* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)2Bertitaylor
27 Jun 25   ii  i`- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Jim Pennino
27 Jun 25   ii  `* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)3Jim Pennino
28 Jun 25   ii   `* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)2Bertitaylor
28 Jun 25   ii    `- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Jim Pennino
27 Jun 25   i+- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Jim Pennino
27 Jun 25   i`* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)16Paul.B.Andersen
27 Jun 25   i +- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Dekota Hamaev
29 Jun 25   i +- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Jim Pennino
29 Jun 25   i +- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Martino Krakowski
29 Jun 25   i +- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Jim Pennino
30 Jun 25   i +- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Bertitaylor
30 Jun 25   i +- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Kerwin Baklanov
1 Jul 25   i +- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Jim Pennino
1 Jul 25   i +* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)3Jim Pennino
1 Jul 25   i i`* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)2Bertitaylor
1 Jul 25   i i `- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Jim Pennino
2 Jul18:20   i +* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)3Paul.B.Andersen
2 Jul18:46   i i+- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Maciej Woźniak
3 Jul09:43   i i`- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Paul.B.Andersen
2 Jul19:34   i +- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Paul.B.Andersen
4 Jul23:00   i `- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Truman Agamov
3 Jul15:06   `- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Bertitaylor

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal