Re: SpaceTime

W dniu 01.06.2024 o 22:46, Ross Finlayson pisze:

On 06/01/2024 01:37 PM, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

W dniu 01.06.2024 o 21:53, Ross Finlayson pisze:

On 06/01/2024 10:48 AM, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

W dniu 31.05.2024 o 06:25, Tom Roberts pisze:

On 5/30/24 12:48 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:

Spacetime is simply what exists, [...]

>
No, NOT AT ALL! You REALLY do not understand very basic physics, at a
fundamental level that distorts all your 'thinking' and everything you
write.
>
Spacetime is a MODEL of spatial-temporal relationships observed in the
real world.

>
No, NOT AT ALL! You REALLY do not understand very basic physics, at a
fundamental level that distorts all your 'thinking' and everything you
write.
Spacetime is a MODEL  of spatial-temporal relationships
gedanken/fabricated by some religious maniacs, like yourself.
>
>

>
Space-Time is a perfectly good idea of a

>
>
Measured its goodness? Or just sure it
must be perfectly good because you're
sooooooo best?
>
>
>
continuous manifold of

Euclidean space

>
>
A lie, of course, your idiot guru has rejected
Euclidean math as it didn't want to fit his
madness.
>

 Einstein didn't, he entertained different coordinate settings
and that tensors connect them, then though he at some point
in his expressed opinion said silly things about simultaneity,
later his expressed opinion included a clock hypothesis and
a "the time", where he introduces the "spacial" for the "special"
contra the "spatial" with respect to "t".

The mumble of the idiot was not even consistent.
And, yes, later on, in his GR shit, his madness
reached the point when he rejected basic [Euclidean]
math - because it didn't want to fit his postulates.