Re: SpaceTime

W dniu 02.06.2024 o 20:54, Ross Finlayson pisze:

On 06/02/2024 11:17 AM, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

W dniu 02.06.2024 o 19:13, Ross Finlayson pisze:

On 06/02/2024 09:57 AM, gharnagel wrote:

Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 02.06.2024 o 14:48, gharnagel pisze:

>
Since we don't really understand what "space-time" is,

>
Since you don't, you really should shut up,
Harrie.

>
>
Pot, kettle, black, Wozzie-fool.  You don't seem to understand
anything, so your fickle finger points right back at you :-))

>
I'd only heard of that after there was re-syndicated "Laugh-In"
on the free OTA television I used to watch.
>
I was like "this is amusing, yet what a bunch of flakes".
Horn-dogs and flakes, ....
>
I quit watching television about a year ago yet have
already watched most what's considered "syndicated" television,
or the '70's and '80's and some of the '60's as it were.
>
>
There is an idea that Maciej basically _is_ a tea-kettle,
and all he has to look at all day is the Parameterized-Post-Newtonian,
then also a translation chart to Naive-Einstein-SR's-Wrong-GR,
and he always has to re-compute to reflect what he thinks people
either way need the numbers both ways, and erupts "mumble".
>
>
>
Of course the "Parameterized Post-Newtonian" _is_ the ephemeris
in effect, with regards to Earthly things the things near Earth.
>
Most people know that dead-reckoning isn't really a thing,
then there's wide reliance on the constancy of light-speed,
and its effectively large value.

>
>
And in the meantime in the real world - forbidden
by your bunch of mumbling religious maniacs "improper"
clocks of TAI and GPS keep measuring t'=t, just like
all serious clocks always did.
>

>
So, in a sense it's like "two wrongs".
>
>

>

 A common reduction expressing "incredulity, lack thereof":  "Duh".

Stop making wise faces, poor fanatic idiot,
the mumble of your insane guru was not even
consistent and that has been provven.