Re: Langevin's paradox again

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sp relativity 
Sujet : Re: Langevin's paradox again
De : mlwozniak (at) *nospam* wp.pl (Maciej Wozniak)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 09. Jul 2024, 18:05:06
Autres entêtes
Organisation : NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-ID : <17e09a4b32733fa4$874$506977$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
W dniu 09.07.2024 o 17:47, Python pisze:
Le 09/07/2024 à 17:35, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
W dniu 09.07.2024 o 17:02, Python pisze:
Le 09/07/2024 à 16:54, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
...
It is. Apart of mumbling inconsistently -
the idiot didn't understand what yhe
human age is, how it is determined and
that clocks have nothing in common with
that.
Of course, an age of a human is determined
by subtracting his birthdate from the
current date. It always was.
>
*facepalm*
>
You stupidity is abysmal Wozniak.
>
When a person's age is unknown there are biological
ways to estimate it, you know?
 
You really think that
these methods are inaccurate?
>
You really think they are not
 So you cannot answer. No surprise.
You fabricate and lie. No surprise.
 Aging is a biological process.  It matches with stationary> (respectively with the person's body) clocks
No, poor stinker, it doesn't.
No surprise you don't know, of cxourse -
You generally know very little.

As a matter of fact metabolism is a kind of clock.
No, poor stinker, it is not.
Just like all relativistic morons
you don't know what a clock is.
And determining of age is still
- subtracting dates. That a fanatic
piece of shit doesn't like it
changes  nothing.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
9 Jul 24 * Re: Langevin's paradox again161Thomas Heger
9 Jul 24 `* Re: Langevin's paradox again160Richard Hachel
9 Jul 24  +* Re: Langevin's paradox again6Maciej Wozniak
9 Jul 24  i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again5Python
9 Jul 24  i `* Re: Langevin's paradox again4Maciej Wozniak
9 Jul 24  i  `* Re: Langevin's paradox again3Python
9 Jul 24  i   `* Re: Langevin's paradox again2Maciej Wozniak
9 Jul 24  i    `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Python
9 Jul 24  +* Re: Langevin's paradox again10Maciej Wozniak
9 Jul 24  i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again9Richard Hachel
10 Jul 24  i `* Re: Langevin's paradox again8Python
10 Jul 24  i  `* Re: Langevin's paradox again7Richard Hachel
10 Jul 24  i   `* Re: Langevin's paradox again6Python
10 Jul 24  i    +* Re: Langevin's paradox again4Python
10 Jul 24  i    i+* Re: Langevin's paradox again2Richard Hachel
11 Jul 24  i    ii`- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Python
10 Jul 24  i    i`- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
10 Jul 24  i    `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
10 Jul 24  +* Re: Langevin's paradox again2Thomas Heger
10 Jul 24  i`- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
10 Jul 24  `* Re: Langevin's paradox again141Paul.B.Andersen
10 Jul 24   +- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
10 Jul 24   +- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
11 Jul 24   `* Re: Langevin's paradox again138Richard Hachel
11 Jul 24    `* Re: Langevin's paradox again137Paul.B.Andersen
11 Jul 24     +- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
11 Jul 24     +- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
11 Jul 24     +- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
11 Jul 24     +* Re: Langevin's paradox again29Richard Hachel
12 Jul 24     i+* Re: Langevin's paradox again22Paul.B.Andersen
12 Jul 24     ii+- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Maciej Wozniak
12 Jul 24     ii`* Re: Langevin's paradox again20Richard Hachel
14 Jul 24     ii `* Re: Langevin's paradox again19Paul.B.Andersen
14 Jul 24     ii  +- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Maciej Wozniak
14 Jul 24     ii  `* Re: Langevin's paradox again17Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24     ii   `* Re: Langevin's paradox again16Paul.B.Andersen
15 Jul 24     ii    +* Re: Langevin's paradox again14Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24     ii    i+- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Python
15 Jul 24     ii    i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again12Paul.B.Andersen
15 Jul 24     ii    i `* Re: Langevin's paradox again11Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24     ii    i  `* Re: Langevin's paradox again10Paul.B.Andersen
15 Jul 24     ii    i   `* Re: Langevin's paradox again9Richard Hachel
16 Jul 24     ii    i    `* Re: Langevin's paradox again8Paul.B.Andersen
16 Jul 24     ii    i     `* Re: Langevin's paradox again7Richard Hachel
16 Jul 24     ii    i      `* Re: Langevin's paradox again6Paul.B.Andersen
16 Jul 24     ii    i       +* Re: Langevin's paradox again4Richard Hachel
17 Jul 24     ii    i       i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again3Paul.B.Andersen
17 Jul 24     ii    i       i `* Re: Langevin's paradox again2Richard Hachel
17 Jul 24     ii    i       i  `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Paul.B.Andersen
17 Jul 24     ii    i       `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Stefan Ram
16 Jul 24     ii    `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Haynh Molnár Jue
12 Jul 24     i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again6ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
12 Jul 24     i +* Re: Langevin's paradox again2Richard Hachel
12 Jul 24     i i`- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Maciej Wozniak
12 Jul 24     i +* Re: Langevin's paradox again2Richard Hachel
12 Jul 24     i i`- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Maciej Wozniak
12 Jul 24     i `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
11 Jul 24     `* Re: Langevin's paradox again104Stefan Ram
11 Jul 24      +* Re: Langevin's paradox again102Richard Hachel
11 Jul 24      i+- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Maciej Wozniak
11 Jul 24      i+- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Athel Cornish-Bowden
12 Jul 24      i+* Re: Langevin's paradox again8Mikko
12 Jul 24      ii`* Re: Langevin's paradox again7Athel Cornish-Bowden
14 Jul 24      ii +* Re: Langevin's paradox again4Mikko
14 Jul 24      ii i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again3Maciej Wozniak
14 Jul 24      ii i `* Re: Langevin's paradox again2Richard Hachel
14 Jul 24      ii i  `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Finis Maryanna
14 Jul 24      ii `* Re: Langevin's paradox again2Richard Hachel
14 Jul 24      ii  `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Athel Cornish-Bowden
12 Jul 24      i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again91Paul.B.Andersen
12 Jul 24      i +* Re: Langevin's paradox again83Richard Hachel
14 Jul 24      i i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again82Paul.B.Andersen
14 Jul 24      i i +* Re: Langevin's paradox again80Richard Hachel
14 Jul 24      i i i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again79Paul.B.Andersen
14 Jul 24      i i i +- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Conard Lèmmi
14 Jul 24      i i i +- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
14 Jul 24      i i i +* Re: Langevin's paradox again5Richard Hachel
14 Jul 24      i i i i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again4Paul.B.Andersen
14 Jul 24      i i i i +- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Maciej Wozniak
14 Jul 24      i i i i +- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24      i i i i `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Thomas Heger
14 Jul 24      i i i +- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
14 Jul 24      i i i `* Re: Langevin's paradox again70Richard Hachel
14 Jul 24      i i i  `* Re: Langevin's paradox again69Paul.B.Andersen
14 Jul 24      i i i   `* Re: Langevin's paradox again68Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24      i i i    `* Re: Langevin's paradox again67Paul.B.Andersen
15 Jul 24      i i i     +* Re: Langevin's paradox again65Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24      i i i     i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again64Paul.B.Andersen
15 Jul 24      i i i     i +* Re: Langevin's paradox again36Richard Hachel
16 Jul 24      i i i     i i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again35Paul.B.Andersen
16 Jul 24      i i i     i i `* Re: Langevin's paradox again34Richard Hachel
16 Jul 24      i i i     i i  `* Re: Langevin's paradox again33Paul.B.Andersen
16 Jul 24      i i i     i i   +* Re: Langevin's paradox again20Richard Hachel
16 Jul 24      i i i     i i   i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again19Paul.B.Andersen
16 Jul 24      i i i     i i   i `* Re: Langevin's paradox again18Richard Hachel
17 Jul 24      i i i     i i   i  `* Re: Langevin's paradox again17Paul.B.Andersen
17 Jul 24      i i i     i i   i   `* Re: Langevin's paradox again16Richard Hachel
18 Jul 24      i i i     i i   i    `* Re: Langevin's paradox again15Paul.B.Andersen
18 Jul 24      i i i     i i   i     +* Re: Langevin's paradox again8Richard Hachel
19 Jul 24      i i i     i i   i     i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again7J. J. Lodder
19 Jul 24      i i i     i i   i     i `* Re: Langevin's paradox again6Richard Hachel
18 Jul 24      i i i     i i   i     `* Re: Langevin's paradox again6Jean-Michel Affoinez y Lopez-Francos
16 Jul 24      i i i     i i   `* Re: Langevin's paradox again12Python
15 Jul 24      i i i     i `* Re: Langevin's paradox again27Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24      i i i     `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
14 Jul 24      i i `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Maciej Wozniak
12 Jul 24      i +- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
12 Jul 24      i +* Re: Langevin's paradox again3Richard Hachel
12 Jul 24      i +- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
12 Jul 24      i `* Re: Langevin's paradox again2Richard Hachel
11 Jul 24      `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Maciej Wozniak

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal