Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of The Shit

W dniu 22.08.2024 o 18:47, gharnagel pisze:

On Thu, 22 Aug 2024 15:12:33 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second
As seen, the definition of second loved so
much to be invoked by relativistic morons -

 Proof here that Wozniak is the one who slanders.
 

wasn't valid in the time when their idiot guru
lived and mumbled. Up to 1960 it was ordinary
1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.
>
Now: an observer moving with c/2 wrt
solar system is measuring the length
of solar day. What is the result predicted
by the Einsteinian physics?
One prediction is - 99766. From the
postulates. The second prediction is -
86400. From definition.
And similiarly with the prediction of
a measurement of a meridian.

 Is this supposed to be Wozniak's so-called
"proof" that relativity is "inconsistent?
Wozniak conflates a moving observer with a
stationary observer

A lie, as expected from a relativistic
idiot in general and from Harrie especially,
one observer present here, a moving (wrt
Solar System) one.