Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of The Shit

W dniu 27.08.2024 o 06:23, gharnagel pisze:

On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 15:00:01 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 26.08.2024 o 16:35, gharnagel pisze:

>
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 13:19:02 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
So, the physics of your idiot guru had no definition
of second? Will you be impudent enough for such
an absurd lie, trash?

>
Copying and pasting falsehoods seems to be Wozniak's
stock in trade.

>
Desperate avoiding of answerring simple questions
seems to be Harmagel's stock in trade. Do you
think that the answer will change just because
of your refusing to spell it?

 The only "questions" Wozniak asks are dishonest ones,

All questions Harmagel doesn't like are
dishonest - typical for a brainwashed
religious maniac.

Wozniak is being deceitful since the problem he posed
[added back in because Wozniak deleted it because he
found ti to be devastating to his false narrative]
had to do with an observer moving at c/s, which has
nothing to do with the GPS.  Dishonest people try to
change the narrative when they realize their vacuous
assertions are refuted.

>
Oh, it's just a reminding that you're
a reality denying idiot, just like all
Einstein's worshippers.

 "When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of
the losers. -- Socrates

And that's why you and your fellow idiots,
apart of denying the reality, slander so
much.

 

I'm only applying the definition of second,
valid in the whole physics (including The
Shit of your idiot guru) up to 1960-ies.

>
Wozniak is lying since he was informed that a day
on earth isn't a day on other planets, so 86400
seconds only refers to earth.

>
Harmagel is lying since he knows very well
that my example is about measuring Earth's
day.

 Wozniak is lying again because he claimed earlier
no measurements were made.

Harmagel is lying again because i said directly
that a measurement is in process, and
the whole thread is about predicting
its result by the inconsistent physics
of his idiot guru.
  It was a definition and

a prediction.  Wozniak is definitely a turtle now
because I predicted it then.  Does he now remember
now? :-))
 

Nothing unexpected from a fanatic of The
Shit, of course.

 Nothing unexpected from a fanatical congenital
liar and slanderer who cowardly runs away from
facing the proof that his assertions are vacuous
nonsense:
 And he continues to lie by omission because he
can't defend his flimsy assertions by the clod,
hard facts which refute them:
 https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/experiments.html
 https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2010/09/nist-pair-aluminum-atomic-clocks-reveal-einsteins-relativity-personal-scale
 https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2014.15970
 "Experiments at a particle accelerator in Germany confirm
that time moves slower for a moving clock than for a
stationary one."

A very impudent lie, believable only by
idiots like you; no moving clocks were
involved - relativistic idiots have only
fabricated them.
On the other hand, we have GPS, anyone
can check, moving clocks are keeping
synchronization.

 And THAT's why the moving observer would observe a day on

No, if we put an observer on a GPS satellite,
he would obviously observe the same thing
we do: the clocks are keeping sync.
But that's irrelevant for the thread which is
about inconsistency of The Shit of your idiot
guru, not about any observation.