Re: The truth about the Lorentz Transformation.

W dniu 19.09.2024 o 15:01, gharnagel pisze:

On Thu, 19 Sep 2024 12:10:10 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 19.09.2024 o 13:58, gharnagel pisze:

>
On Tue, 17 Sep 2024 3:16:44 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:

>
In reality, the LT is the difference in time taken for the

transverse

and longitudinal beams.
Like with a river current, the longitudinal motion will be delayed

more

than the transverse.
This is the difference that should have been detected by the
Michelson-Morley experiment.
As with water that is not flowing, we don't need these equations

without

an ether.
Since relativity does not involve an ether, applying the Lorentz
Transformation in this context is nonsensical.

>
So what are you trying to say?
(1) "We need the LT because there IS an ether."
(2) "We don't need the LT because there is no ether."
(3) You have no idea what you're trying to say.
>
I submit that (1) and (2) are false.

>
And that GPS clocks can't be real, as they don't
want to fit the delusions of your idiot guru.

 As is his usual wont, Wozniak is garbling GR with SR
in a sorry attempt to get his name in print to stroke

As is his usual wont, Harnagel is raving, slandering and
insulting in a sorry attempt to deny the reality,
where GPS clocks are in sync and their indications
are always equal - with the precision of an acceptable
error.