Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity

W dniu 02.10.2024 o 21:00, Python pisze:

Le 02/10/2024 à 20:54, Thomas Heger a écrit :

Am Dienstag000001, 01.10.2024 um 14:54 schrieb Python:
>

But in a relativistic universe where each observer has his own hyperplane of present time?

>
What do you mean by "hyperlane"?

>
The set of all points, which could be connected to an events by a hypothetical signal with infinite velocity builds actually a three dimensional space.
>
In RT-lingo, this is a hyperplane (of the present).
>
Imagine you would 'flatten' space to a 2-dimensional sheet.
>
>
TH
>

...

>
>
Why do you answer him? You can see that he is crazy.
>
He claims to be a great expert in relativity, but he is incapable of understanding what a simple "hyperplane" is.
>
R.H.

>
I do know what a hyperplane is :-) Neither Thomas nor you do :-)
>

>
'Hyperplane' has a sigtly different meaning than 'hyperplane of present time'.
>
But apparently your question was about the 'hyperplane of the present' in context of RT and not about the general case of a hyperplane in mathematics.
>
In case of RT, my explanation was correct!

  The mathematical definition of hyperplane match with the definition
of hyperplane of simultaneity

Your bunch of idiots has no definition
of simultaneity and you're a lying stinker,
poor stinker.
(not "present") sure.
"present" is a special case of simultaneity,
even such an idiot should be able to get it.