Re: The CMBR Disproves the Big Bang.

W dniu 28.02.2025 o 06:05, Ross Finlayson pisze:

On 02/26/2025 11:06 PM, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

W dniu 27.02.2025 o 05:26, Ross Finlayson pisze:

On 02/25/2025 05:27 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:

guido wugi <wugi@brol.invalid> wrote:
>

Op 23/02/2025 om 14:46 schreef Paul.B.Andersen:

Den 22.02.2025 20:18, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:

The velocity-distance relation fails to explain the redshift distance
relation because the latter is exactly the same in every direction so
the former would place us at exactly the center of the universe.

>
Do you still not understand that we are in the exact centre of
the observable universe?

>
He doesn't understand yet the relatitivity of the centre of the
universe ;)
(even at big bang an infinite universe is still a possibility)

>
>
Here is Piet Hein's take on it
>
>
THE CENTRAL POINT
A philosophistry
>
I am the Universe's Centre.
No subtle sceptics can confound me;
for how can other viewpoints enter,
when all the rest is all around me?
>
>
Hard to argue with that,
>
Jan
>

>
"I know a girl called Trampoline, ...".
>
is a line from a song with these lines:
>
"When I was three /
I thought the world revolved around me /
I was wrong."
>
Infant
>
Objectivism is a maturity phase in the

>
There is no such thing and the truth "objective"
is  combined from subjective ones by voting.
>

 The inter-objective is a prime goal in the
matters of true "truth"

There is no such thing, however, and and the truth
"objective" is  combined from subjective ones by
voting.
Trying to determine whether a statement is "true"
or "false" - has no sense and no chance without
understanding the words and the rules of the
language the statement is written in.
Apart of a human brain (or, partially, human
programmed  computers) - nothing has the
ability. So, if human brains together
decide it's true - there is nowhere to appeal.
And, BTW - these rules may change. So does truth.
Copernicus didn't discover the truth, he changed
the way we speak instead.