Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of Einstein's physics

Maciej Wozniak wrote:
 

W dniu 07.04.2025 o 19:17, Benito Grünewald pisze:

Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>

That implies knowing solar days exactly. Here more to undrestand
seconds. The mechanics of it.
????? ???? ????? ?? ? ?????????? ?? ???????
https://%42i%74%43hute.com/vi%44eo/lgGMsNdPNANx

>
It helps even more to understand that the particular definition of
any unit of time is completely irrelevant for any kind of physics.
Physical results cannot depend on it, by definition,

>
Can't they? By definition? By WHAT definition, poor trash?
Anyway, they absolutely do. And you're a reality denier, as expected
from a relativistic idiot.

>
please be careful, I can see now he is also wrong, but no reason to
apply insults. I hate insults.

>
You're a troll on the leash of a piece of shit from Moscow, why would
anyone care what you hate or not.

 can't you see the man is german, you stupid polak. Indeed, the gay polakia
is a Russian province. You don't know your history, you indolent polak.
 

Time is not about definitions, since it's a dimension

>
It absolutely is about definitions, since it's a dimension. All
abstracts are about definitions.

 a dimension is not abstract, you puerile deplorable imbecile.