Re: Einstein FRAUD with the paper on m=E/c^2

On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 13:35:41 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
<snip>

It is much correct in what you say.
>
BUT:
The equation
   E = ∝ m
say there is some kind of equivalence between mass and energy,
and that mass can be converted to energy and vice versa.
>
This can only be empirically tested.

<snip>

E = m
>
But remember, the equivalency is empirically shown to be true.

It's a no-brainer to believe in the conversion of mass into energy.
In the last couple of millenniums, or even longer than that, and even
before the CONSENSUS that heat was a kind of energy (early XIX century),
thousands/millions of inquisitive minds wondered HOW COME wood in a fire
CONSUMED to ashes, with most of its volume disappearing, while heat
(radiant, by convection or conduction) was generated. The first
water-based engine/toy was invented about 2,000 years ago.
The heated water disappeared (mass), converting the opposite flows into
mechanical work (energy). Ancient Romans enjoyed this gadget, and I'm
sure that many tried to find a practical use of this effect.
https://www.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/oqn2f/til_the_ancient_romans_had_steam_engines_the/
What I've been questioned here, for years, is that E=mc^2 is A FUCKING
CONVENTION, and that Einstein committed FRAUD in his FUCKING 1905 paper,
using circular reasoning. After a few years, seal physicists applauded
this simple equation (NOT PROVEN ONCE THEORETICALLY), and hyped the
image of Einstein as the genius of geniuses.
Relativity is MORE A CULT than anything else. It's a pseudoscience that
the Jewish community has been shoving down the throat of gullible, yet
intelligent people.
A fucking CULT, promoted by Jewish media and publishing houses. There
were better and much more intelligent people than the fucking
plagiarist. YET,....
1946:
https://content.time.com/time/covers/0,16641,19460701,00.html
1999:
https://content.time.com/time/covers/0,16641,19991231,00.html
E=mc^2, A CONVENTION ADOPTED FOR EASINESS IN SCIENCE, YET UNPROVEN
THEORETICALLY SO FAR.
Same shit with KE = 1/2 m v^2  (why 1/2 is present?)
Do you want true science examples?
- Kepler laws, derived from empirical evidence.
- Newton laws, derived from Kepler laws, Galileo's work and many others.
- Maxwell laws, derived from empirical data + proven insights for
decades,
  collected by Faraday, Gauss and HUNDRED of experimentalists.
- Alpha and Beta radiation (Rutherford) plus the insight of atomic
structure
  PLUS heavy experimentation.
- Quantum of action h (Planck), derived by fitting theoretically data
collected
  for almost a decade (XIX century) from the PTB labs AND Wien's
theories.
Pseudoscience examples?
- Relativity, derived by A FUCKING CLERK with no prior antecedents of
being
  a genius, but plenty of evidence of being a charlatan, a fraudster, an
  impostor with no moral nor scruples. A beggar, who cheated and
backstabbed
  everyone who him HYPNOTIZED to get their help. A master plagiarist.