Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,

CORRECTION TO MY PREVIOUS CORRECTION (I forgot to get the picture
completely):
And a disclaimer: I have a problem when posting, besides that English is
not my native tongue.
When I have an idea about a post, I write the entire post in a
"feed-forward" mode. This means that I write the post entirely, and I
DON'T REVISIT IT. It's a problem that I have had since ever, which
causes that I discover mistakes in my previous comments ONCE I press
PUBLISH.
I don't regret this way of being, and even like it. I always considered
that information is consolidated through successive steps of refinement,
and I allow myself to write (or speak) in an "open-loop" mode, and
corrections will be made (if necessary) in further steps. Those who knew
my way of doing didn´t mind because the final result of my thoughts were
highly accurate.
IN THIS CASE, I forgot to account A THIRD FLIGHT WESTWARDS, once the
first eastward stage was complete.
But, bringing the two first clocks to Washington WOULD HAVE CONTAIN THE
ENTIRE "ALLEGED TIME DILATION", something that DIDN'T HAPPEN to the
second pair of clocks used in the westward flight to U.S.
CONCLUSION: THERE WAS NO SEPARATE MEASUREMENT FOR THE EASTWARD FLIGHT.
Bringing the clocks back to US would accumulate the WESTWARD EFFECT,
plus the eastward effect.
With the second pair of atomic clocks, flying WESTWARD, the measurements
at the US lab would have the info of that segment of the trip. So, only
the second pair of clocks could have allowed the westward difference BY
SEPARATE.
I can imagine that those crooks used the info measured in the lab for
the westward clocks, and SUBSTRACTED such value from the time data
accumulated in the first pair (more cooking).
Now, I consider my explanation COMPLETE.