Sujet : Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of The Shit
De : hitlong (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 31. Aug 2024, 12:52:26
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <3ed9d78af41ee6880cf864a02867213a@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Sat, 31 Aug 2024 4:42:06 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
W dniu 31.08.2024 o 00:38, gharnagel pisze:
>
On Fri, 30 Aug 2024 13:57:30 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
I win because I've proven the thesis I claimed.
You loose because apart of mad ravings, idiotic
lies, dodging questions, insult and slanders
you presented nothing. Sorry, trash.
>
Wozzie deletes the entire disproof that his insane
assertions because he knows that it's bool poop.
>
I've pointed out 2 denying themself predictions
derivable in the physics of your idiot guru.
I've proven its inconsistency.
Wozzie's "thesis" is a concocted fantasy. His claim
that relativity is inconsistent is based on ridiculous
assertions (1) that the "definition" of a day (84600
seconds) applies to the entire universe, (2) that
relativity is false because it predicts that an observer
moving at c/2 will measure a day on earth as 99766
seconds and (3) that copious experimental evidence
supporting relativity is fabricated by lying scientists.
A fanatic doggie screaming "NOOOOO!!!!" and waving
his arms is changing nothing. Sorry, trash.
It is obvious that the only one screaming "NOOOOO!!!!"
and lying in his teeth is the poor mentally-unbalanced
Maciej Wozniak.
"Clinical paranoia is a rare mental health condition
in which you believe that others are unfair, lying,
or actively trying to harm you"
He also has delusions of grandeur, believing he's
disproved relativity with the ridiculous points
enumerated above.
No one in his right mind would accept assertion #1
on the bare face of it. Only someone stuck in the
17th century with Newton's universal time would
believe that. Anyone who understands relativity
and its experimental basis rejects #2 and #3 as
infantile babbling. Insistence on them only prove
that Wozniak is not competent to criticize relativity.
And, no, cutting and pasting his repeated rantings
isn't a rebuttal. They're only a sorry attempt to be
the last poster in a thread and, therefore, "prove"
that he "won" the contest. How infantile!