Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of The Shit

On Wed, 28 Aug 2024 13:55:24 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 28.08.2024 o 14:54, gharnagel pisze:

>
On Wed, 28 Aug 2024 5:42:04 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 28.08.2024 o 06:08, gharnagel pisze:

>
Le 27/08/2024 à 16:51, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

>
No clocks were ever accelerated in any accelerator.
It's an impudent lie believable only by fanatic idiots.

>
This is another of Wozniak's multitudinous prevarications.
He tacitly accepts atomic clocks when he asserts his false
GPS t' = t baloney (t' is the time kept by the satellite
clock which is NOT t by design).  Atomic clocks keep time
by Cs-133 atoms, so atoms are clocks.

>
No they are not, you simply don't know
what a clock is, just like most (if not
all) of relativistic idiots.
https://www.istockphoto.com/pl/search/2/image-film?phrase=clock

>
Wozniak lacks sufficient vision and is woefully ignorant of
the information he worships:
>
https://www.britannica.com/technology/atomic-clock

>
Harmagel is lying and slandering withaut any
basement, as usual. Nothing changes,
https://www.istockphoto.com/pl/search/2/image-film?phrase=clock
clocks are like that, an atom is not.

So L'il Wozzie-boy, self-proclaimed information
guru, says I'm lying and slandering because I
provided a link to the information in britannica.
No other proof is neede that Wozniak is a totally
unhinged mental case.

And - anyone can check GPS, or TAI, or UTC
-  atomic clocks don't keep "time by
Cs-133 atom",  they keep something else.

>
Wozzie keeps something else: it's called lying.

>
Not the first Harrie's demonstration
of denying the reality.

That's right, not the first, because I haven't done
so even once.  OTOH, fatally-dishonest Wozzie-fool
doesn't believe tons of information and claims to
be an information guru.  He lives in his own little
bubble-world and blows saliva bubbles all day.

Or rather, any relativistic doggie will spit
at anyone not kneeling before his beloved
idiocies with all its might.

>
Woxniak is projecting his own despicable behavior as he
insults and slanders his way through his so-called life

>
Harmagel is projecting his own despicable behavior as he
insults and slanders his way through his so-called life

I tried being nice to Wozzie-liar to reach his better side,
but he's proven that he doesn't have one.  So once again,
he gets what he gives and now he whines and whines because
of it.  He's a bully, and when bullies get what they give
they cry about it.  Wah! Wah!  L'il Wozzie, run to Mama!

where the OP was about what SR predicts for an
observer moving at c/2.

>
So experiments are the sine qua non of the validity of
any theory,

>
They are not,

Woziie-liar is in deep, deep denial.  He needs serious
mental help.

but people much wiser than you made the mistake too.

So it's a mistake to check the validity of a theory with
experiments?  This fool joker is completely deranged.

Anyway, you don't need them when the theory is inconsistent,
like the mumble of your idiot guru was.

Says the congenital liar and denier of reality.

So L'il Wozzie can conclude assumptions are inconsistent
without examining them?

>
Assumptions are inconsistent when they give
some conclusions denying each other,

Which doesn't happen with relativity.  Wozzie has delusions
of grandeur
https://psychcentral.com/blog/grandiosity-and-delusion-grandeur#definition
boast about real or exaggerated accomplishments
consider yourself more talented or intelligent than others
dismiss or try to one-up the achievements of others

Like - pretending that GPS clock are not real,

>
No one is saying that.

>
But some idiot was saying that.

Wozzie-liar is the one saying that, so that makes him
the idiot by his own words.