Re: SpaceTime

Richard Hachel wrote:

>
Le 03/06/2024 à 01:22, hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) a écrit :

>
 That is not a valid science.

 :))

 And tachyons? Yes?

They are hypothetical until confirmed by experiment, but they
cannot be refuted without experimental evidence.  Bloviating
doesn't count as evidence.

 And they don't violate causality.

>
 :))
>
It's impossible.

“When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is
possible,
he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is
impossible, he
is very probably wrong.” -- Arthur C. Clarke
And Dr. Hachel is not even a scientist.  His three Nobels in basket
weaving aren't science, either.

They will prefer to sink into the absurd and the ridiculous loss of causality.

Nope. DOI: 10.13189/ujpa.2023.170101 demonstrates that there is no
proof
that they would violate causality.  Try reading something for a change
instead of making pompous and vacuous assertions.

Note that the speed of neutrinos is c, because their transaction is instantaneous (zero natural time).

Repetition of vacuous thinking is still invalid.

It is true that if a supernovae explodes, the neutrinos, whose speed is
 not modified by the interactions of intergalactic gases, can arrive slightly before the light (supernovae of 1987).

Three hours, actually, from 168000 light-years away.  Attributing all
of that 3 hours to intergalactic gas is pure speculation.

But this does not come from the fact that they are faster than light
(this is impossible)

If scientists stopped when confronted with the impossible, we would not
have flight, medicine, heart surgery, brain surgery, electric lights,
electricity, or dynamite (Nobel prizes).
Dr. Hachel only proves that his only claim to fame is 3 Nobels in
basket
weaving.