Re: Spacetime

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sp relativity 
Sujet : Re: Spacetime
De : hitlong (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 05. Jul 2024, 14:25:34
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <66338588d7c6c93d2a18a48411575d47@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
Thomas Heger wrote:
>
Am Donnerstag000004, 04.07.2024 um 18:39 schrieb gharnagel:
>
Thomas Heger wrote:
>
One unusual assumption is: points may have features and more than
three
dimensions.
>
I think points are nonexistent.  They are a mental invention to
express
geometrical concepts, just like numbers were invented to express
mathematical concepts.
>
Sure: a point is actually meant as coordinate in space, hence not really
real in a coordinate free space.
And space is coordinate-free.

But real things are usually meant to consist of something.
>
If spacetime is real and a smooth continuum, than spacetime would
consists of 'pointlike elements'.
Which is why it's not real.

If so, we need to build particles out of these 'points', if we like to
combine GR and QM.
>
This sounds strange, to say the least, but is actually quite good,
because it allows such things as 'big bang' or pair-creation.
Fields seem to work okay.

Then we need something, that could eventually behave the way, that
particles could be a substructur under a certain perspective.
>
I meant that a certain type of quaternions would match the discription
and wrote my 'book' about this idea.
Quaternions are mathematical concepts, not real.

I wanted something different than one of the usual
'materialistic'
concepts, to which string-theory actually belongs.
>
That's where ALL of physics IS.
>
Sure,
>
So you agree that your idea is not physics?  Hmmm.
>
no, not quite.
>
It's physics, but I'm not a physicist.
>
That is similar to other professions, say medicine:
So you want a nonprofessional to operate on you?

I'm not a professional, but that doesn't mean, that my remedy does not
heal.
>
...
>
TH
We'll have to agree to disagree.  I think you like your idea too much.
"4. Try not to get overly attached to a hypothesis just because
it’s yours. It’s only a way station in the pursuit of knowledge.
Ask yourself why you like the idea. Compare it fairly with the
alternatives. See if you can find reasons for rejecting it. If you
don’t, others will." -- Carl Sagan

Date Sujet#  Auteur
25 Jun 24 * Spacetime61gharnagel
25 Jun 24 +* Re: Spacetime41Thomas Heger
26 Jun 24 i`* Re: Spacetime40gharnagel
27 Jun 24 i `* Re: Spacetime39Thomas Heger
27 Jun 24 i  `* Re: Spacetime38gharnagel
27 Jun 24 i   +- Re: Spacetime1Maciej Wozniak
30 Jun 24 i   `* Re: Spacetime36Thomas Heger
30 Jun 24 i    `* Re: Spacetime35gharnagel
4 Jul 24 i     `* Re: Spacetime34Thomas Heger
4 Jul 24 i      `* Re: Spacetime33gharnagel
4 Jul 24 i       +* Re: Spacetime25Maciej Wozniak
4 Jul 24 i       i`* Re: Spacetime24gharnagel
5 Jul 24 i       i `* Re: Spacetime23gharnagel
5 Jul 24 i       i  +* Re: Spacetime19Maciej Wozniak
5 Jul 24 i       i  i`* Re: Spacetime18gharnagel
5 Jul 24 i       i  i `* Re: Spacetime17gharnagel
6 Jul 24 i       i  i  `* Re: Spacetime16gharnagel
6 Jul 24 i       i  i   +* Re: Spacetime14Maciej Wozniak
6 Jul 24 i       i  i   i`* Re: Spacetime13gharnagel
6 Jul 24 i       i  i   i +- Re: Spacetime1Erich Missiakos Kong
6 Jul 24 i       i  i   i `* Re: Spacetime11gharnagel
7 Jul 24 i       i  i   i  `* Re: Spacetime10Maciej Wozniak
7 Jul 24 i       i  i   i   `* Re: Spacetime9gharnagel
7 Jul 24 i       i  i   i    `* Re: Spacetime8Maciej Wozniak
7 Jul 24 i       i  i   i     `* Re: Spacetime7gharnagel
8 Jul 24 i       i  i   i      +- Re: Spacetime1Miltiadis Komáromi Hew
8 Jul 24 i       i  i   i      `* Re: Spacetime5gharnagel
8 Jul 24 i       i  i   i       `* Re: Spacetime4gharnagel
8 Jul 24 i       i  i   i        `* Re: Spacetime3gharnagel
8 Jul 24 i       i  i   i         `* Re: Spacetime2Maciej Wozniak
8 Jul 24 i       i  i   i          `- Re: Spacetime1gharnagel
6 Jul 24 i       i  i   `- Re: Spacetime1Rexx Hatukaev
5 Jul 24 i       i  `* Re: Spacetime3Athel Cornish-Bowden
5 Jul 24 i       i   +- Re: Spacetime1Maciej Wozniak
6 Jul 24 i       i   `- Re: Spacetime1gharnagel
5 Jul 24 i       `* Re: Spacetime7Thomas Heger
5 Jul 24 i        +* Re: Spacetime3Maciej Wozniak
6 Jul 24 i        i`* Re: Spacetime2Thomas Heger
6 Jul 24 i        i `- Re: Spacetime1Maciej Wozniak
5 Jul 24 i        `* Re: Spacetime3gharnagel
5 Jul 24 i         +- Re: Spacetime1Maciej Wozniak
6 Jul 24 i         `- Re: Spacetime1Thomas Heger
26 Jun 24 +- Re: Spacetime1Harens Balahovski Bian
19 Jul 24 `* Re: Spacetime18gharnagel
19 Jul 24  +- Re: Spacetime1Lamar Kovács
20 Jul 24  `* Re: Spacetime16Ross Finlayson
20 Jul 24   `* Re: Spacetime15gharnagel
20 Jul 24    +- Re: Spacetime1Tathan Hébert
20 Jul 24    `* Re: Spacetime13Ross Finlayson
20 Jul 24     `* Re: Spacetime12gharnagel
20 Jul 24      `* Re: Spacetime11Ross Finlayson
21 Jul 24       `* Re: Spacetime10gharnagel
21 Jul 24        +- Re: Spacetime1Maciej Wozniak
21 Jul 24        `* Re: Spacetime8Ross Finlayson
21 Jul 24         `* Re: Spacetime7Maciej Wozniak
21 Jul 24          +- Re: Spacetime1Ross Finlayson
22 Jul 24          `* Re: Spacetime5Ross Finlayson
22 Jul 24           +* Re: Spacetime2Maciej Wozniak
22 Jul 24           i`- Re: Spacetime1Ross Finlayson
23 Jul 24           `* Re: Spacetime2Thomas Heger
23 Jul 24            `- Re: Spacetime1Ross Finlayson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal