Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sp relativity 
Sujet : Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix
De : nospam (at) *nospam* de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 17. Sep 2024, 13:34:09
Autres entêtes
Organisation : De Ster
Message-ID : <66e96931$0$3271$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
References : 1
User-Agent : MacSOUP/2.8.5 (ea919cf118) (Mac OS 10.12.6)
Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> wrote:

Does anybody even bother to think about vis-viva versus vis-motrix
anymore, with regards to conservation, momentum, inertia, and energy,
and potential and impulse energy?

Of course not. These are obsolete distinctions,
from a time when energy and momentum conservation was not corectly
understood.
The matter was put to rest by Christiaan Huygens
by showing (for particle collisions)
that momentum conservation and energy conservation
are distinct conservation laws, that are both needed,

Jan


Is it usually considered at all that momentum and inertia change
places with respect to resistance to change of motion and rest
respectively sort of back and forth in the theory since antiquity?
 
Several times?

Date Sujet#  Auteur
17 Sep 24 * vis-viva and vis-motrix33Ross Finlayson
17 Sep 24 +* Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix27J. J. Lodder
17 Sep 24 i`* Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix26Ross Finlayson
22 Sep 24 i `* Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix25Ross Finlayson
22 Sep 24 i  `* Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix24Ross Finlayson
25 Sep 24 i   +* Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix20Ross Finlayson
26 Sep 24 i   i`* Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix19Ross Finlayson
26 Sep 24 i   i `* Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix18Ross Finlayson
26 Sep 24 i   i  +- Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix1Ross Finlayson
28 Sep 24 i   i  +* Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix3Ross Finlayson
28 Sep 24 i   i  i`* Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix2Ross Finlayson
28 Sep 24 i   i  i `- Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix1Ross Finlayson
28 Sep 24 i   i  `* Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix13Thomas Heger
28 Sep 24 i   i   `* Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix12Ross Finlayson
30 Sep03:13 i   i    +- Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix1Ross Finlayson
30 Sep07:20 i   i    `* Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix10Thomas Heger
30 Sep20:55 i   i     `* Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix9Ross Finlayson
1 Oct08:48 i   i      `* Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix8Thomas Heger
1 Oct15:27 i   i       +* Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix4Richard Hachel
1 Oct18:53 i   i       i+- Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix1Ross Finlayson
2 Oct20:58 i   i       i`* Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix2Thomas Heger
3 Oct04:22 i   i       i `- Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix1Ross Finlayson
2 Oct02:49 i   i       `* Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix3Ross Finlayson
3 Oct22:51 i   i        `* Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix2Ross Finlayson
4 Oct04:46 i   i         `- Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix1Ross Finlayson
25 Sep 24 i   `* Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix3J. J. Lodder
26 Sep 24 i    `* Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix2Ross Finlayson
26 Sep 24 i     `- Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix1J. J. Lodder
26 Sep 24 `* Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix5bertietaylor
26 Sep 24  `* Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix4Ross Finlayson
26 Sep 24   +- Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix1bertietaylor
26 Sep 24   `* Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix2bertietaylor
27 Sep 24    `- Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix1Ross Finlayson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal