Re: Oh my God!

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sp relativity 
Sujet : Re: Oh my God!
De : tomyee3 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 01. Oct 2024, 21:24:31
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <6867f373a4258380db55b48d0a440d90@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 18:47:16 +0000, gharnagel wrote:

And you haven't acknowledged your confusion about what frame
is the "stationary" one in the right and left figures.  Just
proclaiming a frame as stationary doesn't make it so, particularly
when you draw its time axis skewed.
I have told you several times that I am designating the S' as
stationary, in addition to plainly stating that fact in my drawing.
Our frame, the S frame, is moving. To simplify the figures, I have
not drawn the S axes, which are orthogonal. The S' axes are skewed
because I am mapping events in S' to our coordinate system, where
our S coordinate system is moving relative to the S' coordinate
system at speeds -0.1c, 0c, and +0.1c.

Prok, I have shown that you completely misunderstood my thesis
whereas the reviewer of DOI: 10.13189/ujpa.2023.170101 did not
or he would have rejected it.  Rather than acknowledge your
error and try to understand, you launch another baseless attack
because of your confusion about what v means.  It is the speed
that D must send the signal (Event E1) so it arrives when C and
A are adjacent (E2).  Furthermore, A must send a signal to B
when B is adjacent to D.  Your figures are only half of the full
problem, and they do NOT describe my "proposal."  They are your
imaginings.  If you want to discuss my thesis, then use my
figures (4 and 5, particularly).  Yours are straw men.
>
And you haven't acknowledged your confusion about what frame
is the "stationary" one in the right and left figures.  Just
proclaiming a frame as stationary doesn't make it so, particularly
when you draw its time axis skewed.
There is only one person here who is confused, and that is YOU.
In the S' frame, an infinite speed tachyonic signal is emitted from
(x',t') = (D,0) and is received in zero time at (x',t') = (C,0)
That is zero time as measured in the S' frame.
The emission and receipt events are concurrently monitored by
observers in three "S" frames, where the "S" frames are moving
relative to the S' frame at speeds -0.1c, 0c, and +0.1c, and so
forth.
In general, observers in the "S" frames do not consider the signals
as traveling from D to C in zero time.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
25 Sep 24 * Oh my God!65Richard Hachel
25 Sep 24 +* Re: Oh my God!60Athel Cornish-Bowden
25 Sep 24 i+* Re: Oh my God!29gharnagel
25 Sep 24 ii+* Re: Oh my God!24Athel Cornish-Bowden
26 Sep 24 iii+* Re: Oh my God!22gharnagel
26 Sep 24 iiii`* Re: Oh my God!21Athel Cornish-Bowden
26 Sep 24 iiii +- Re: Oh my God!1Richard Hachel
27 Sep 24 iiii `* Re: Oh my God!19gharnagel
27 Sep 24 iiii  `* Re: Oh my God!18ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
27 Sep 24 iiii   `* Re: Oh my God!17gharnagel
27 Sep 24 iiii    +* Re: Oh my God!8ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
27 Sep 24 iiii    i`* Re: Oh my God!7gharnagel
28 Sep 24 iiii    i `* Re: Oh my God!6ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
28 Sep 24 iiii    i  +- Re: Oh my God!1ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
28 Sep 24 iiii    i  `* Re: Oh my God!4gharnagel
28 Sep 24 iiii    i   `* Re: Oh my God!3gharnagel
28 Sep 24 iiii    i    `* Re: Oh my God!2ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
28 Sep 24 iiii    i     `- Re: Oh my God!1gharnagel
27 Sep 24 iiii    `* Re: Oh my God!8Richard Hachel
27 Sep 24 iiii     `* Re: Oh my God!7ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
27 Sep 24 iiii      `* Re: Oh my God!6Richard Hachel
27 Sep 24 iiii       `* Re: Oh my God!5gharnagel
28 Sep 24 iiii        `* Re: Oh my God!4Richard Hachel
28 Sep 24 iiii         `* Re: Oh my God!3gharnagel
28 Sep 24 iiii          `* Re: Oh my God!2Richard Hachel
28 Sep 24 iiii           `- Re: Oh my God!1gharnagel
26 Sep 24 iii`- Re: Oh my God!1ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
26 Sep 24 ii+* Re: Oh my God!2gharnagel
26 Sep 24 iii`- Re: Oh my God!1Maciej Wozniak
28 Sep 24 ii`* Re: Oh my God!2J. J. Lodder
28 Sep 24 ii `- Re: Oh my God!1Richard Hachel
26 Sep 24 i`* Re: Oh my God!30Thomas Heger
26 Sep 24 i `* Re: Oh my God!29Richard Hachel
28 Sep 24 i  `* Re: Oh my God!28Thomas Heger
28 Sep 24 i   `* Re: Oh my God!27Richard Hachel
29 Sep11:37 i    +* Re: Oh my God!2Mikko
29 Sep15:56 i    i`- Re: Oh my God!1Richard Hachel
29 Sep22:53 i    `* Re: Oh my God!24gharnagel
1 Oct01:48 i     `* Re: Oh my God!23ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
1 Oct03:13 i      +- Re: Oh my God!1ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
1 Oct15:51 i      `* Re: Oh my God!21gharnagel
1 Oct17:55 i       `* Re: Oh my God!20ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
1 Oct20:47 i        `* Re: Oh my God!19gharnagel
1 Oct21:11 i         +* Re: Oh my God!7Richard Hachel
1 Oct23:56 i         i`* Re: Oh my God!6Python
2 Oct00:13 i         i +* Re: Oh my God!4Richard Hachel
2 Oct00:25 i         i i`* Re: Oh my God!3Python
2 Oct00:34 i         i i +- Re: Oh my God!1Python
2 Oct06:55 i         i i `- Re: Oh my God!1Maciej Wozniak
2 Oct06:53 i         i `- Re: Oh my God!1Maciej Wozniak
1 Oct21:24 i         `* Re: Oh my God!11ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
2 Oct00:18 i          `* Re: Oh my God!10gharnagel
3 Oct00:26 i           `* Re: Oh my God!9ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
3 Oct04:42 i            +- Re: Oh my God!1ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
3 Oct05:04 i            `* Re: Oh my God!7gharnagel
3 Oct10:00 i             +- Re: Oh my God!1ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
3 Oct11:17 i             `* Re: Oh my God!5gharnagel
3 Oct15:39 i              `* Re: Oh my God!4gharnagel
3 Oct19:41 i               `* Re: Oh my God!3gharnagel
4 Oct15:26 i                `* Re: Oh my God!2gharnagel
5 Oct14:59 i                 `- Re: Oh my God!1gharnagel
26 Sep 24 `* Re: Oh my God!4Mikko
26 Sep 24  `* Re: Oh my God!3Richard Hachel
29 Sep11:34   `* Re: Oh my God!2Mikko
29 Sep19:28    `- Re: Oh my God!1Athel Cornish-Bowden

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal