Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.

On Thu, 29 May 2025 19:31:57 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:

Den 27.05.2025 17:49, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:

On Tue, 27 May 2025 9:37:57 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
>

Den 27.05.2025 05:27, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:

Particle wave duality is no longer accepted as it has been
experimentally disproven.
>
>
"Did We Get the Double Slit Experiment All Wrong?"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpMcC-E5l5c

>
The first few statements spoken in the video are:
>
"Did we misunderstand the double slit experiment,
  the most famous experiment in quantum physics?
  We usually interpret it as proof that light is both
  a particle and a wave, the essence of quantum physics.
  Yet in a new paper, a group of physicist disagree.
  It can all be explained by particles, they say."
>
Repeat: "It can all be explained by particles."
>
This is what you seem to believe was said in the video:
>

>
Light is a wave and not a particle.

>
That's was why I wrote:
>

>
Got it upside down and inside out again, Laurence? :-D

>

You do not even attempt to be persuasive.

>
I am not trying to convince you about anything.
>
>
Your question to the AI:
>

"Why do Physicists talk about Wave Particle Duality?

>
The AI answer:
>

The
truth is most professional physicists don’t talk about wave particle
duality, and it is a dying concept.

  ..

In modern textbooks of quantum mechanics and quantum
field theory, talk of wave-particle duality is absent.

>
According to the modern relativistic quantum field theory QED,
light is a particle.
>
>
This is how Laurence Clark Crossen has interpreted the video
and the AI answer:
>

Wave particle duality is not real. It's been invalidated by experiments
so light must be a wave.

>
Still got it backwards and upside down and inside out, Laurence? :-D

The evidence shows that the claim to reduce the light going through the
slits to individual photons is not correct. It still behaves as waves
because it can't be reduced to a particle.
She says complementarity doesn't make sense, but we've gotten used to
that.
They have to invent dark photons to rationalize the results.
She disagreed with the article, saying the dark photons have no energy,
unlike particles.