Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of The Shit

On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 15:00:01 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 26.08.2024 o 16:35, gharnagel pisze:

>
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 13:19:02 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
So, the physics of your idiot guru had no definition
of second? Will you be impudent enough for such
an absurd lie, trash?

>
Copying and pasting falsehoods seems to be Wozniak's
stock in trade.

>
Desperate avoiding of answerring simple questions
seems to be Harmagel's stock in trade. Do you
think that the answer will change just because
of your refusing to spell it?

The only "questions" Wozniak asks are dishonest ones,
like "When are you going to stop beating your wife?"
There was absolutely NOTHING about a second's
definition in his original post.  He has added that
after his false assertion was revealed for what it
was: a lie.  Just like this one is:

The one Harmagel has deleted GPS clocks
from?

>
Wozniak is being deceitful since the problem he posed
[added back in because Wozniak deleted it because he
found ti to be devastating to his false narrative]
had to do with an observer moving at c/s, which has
nothing to do with the GPS.  Dishonest people try to
change the narrative when they realize their vacuous
assertions are refuted.

>
Oh, it's just a reminding that you're
a reality denying idiot, just like all
Einstein's worshippers.

"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of
the losers. -- Socrates

 The only way Wozniak can argue that 86400
seconds per day is valid for the moving observer
is by asserting Newtonian (universal) time.

>
A lie, as expected from a piece of
relativistic shit. It's a direct
consequence of a definition, valid
in your moronic physics up to 1960-ies,
and making the insane mumble of your
idiot guru not even a consistent one.

https://psychcentral.com/blog/psychology-self/2019/08/narcissists-blame-projection#1

I'm only applying the definition of second,
valid in the whole physics (including The
Shit of your idiot guru) up to 1960-ies.

>
Wozniak is lying since he was informed that a day
on earth isn't a day on other planets, so 86400
seconds only refers to earth.

>
Harmagel is lying since he knows very well
that my example is about measuring Earth's
day.

Wozniak is lying again because he claimed earlier
no measurements were made.  It was a definition and
a prediction.  Wozniak is definitely a turtle now
because I predicted it then.  Does he now remember
now? :-))

Nothing unexpected from a fanatic of The
Shit, of course.

Nothing unexpected from a fanatical congenital
liar and slanderer who cowardly runs away from
facing the proof that his assertions are vacuous
nonsense:
And he continues to lie by omission because he
can't defend his flimsy assertions by the clod,
hard facts which refute them:
https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/experiments.html
https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2010/09/nist-pair-aluminum-atomic-clocks-reveal-einsteins-relativity-personal-scale
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2014.15970
"Experiments at a particle accelerator in Germany confirm
that time moves slower for a moving clock than for a
stationary one."
And THAT's why the moving observer would observe a day on
earth consuming 99766 of his seconds while he would also
observe a clock on the earth ticking away 86400 seconds.
Thus, relativity's prediction accurately matches what
happens in the real world.  Wozniak's vapid assertion
is completely refuted, so he cowardly runs away and
hides from the truth.