Re: Newton: Photon falling from h meters increase its energy.

Le 14/01/2025 à 12:11, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 14.01.2025 o 11:23, Python pisze:

Le 14/01/2025 à 00:14, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 13.01.2025 o 23:14, Python pisze:

Le 13/01/2025 à 23:13, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 13.01.2025 o 22:58, Python pisze:

Le 13/01/2025 à 22:45, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 13.01.2025 o 22:40, Python pisze:

Le 13/01/2025 à 22:33, Demented maniac, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 13.01.2025 o 20:50, Python pisze:

Le 13/01/2025 à 20:47, Idiotic kook Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 13.01.2025 o 20:31, Python pisze:

..

Einstein deserved the Nobel Prize for *numerous* reasons:

>
>
Whatever you say - Poincare had enough wit
to understand how idiotic rejecting Euclid
would be, and he has written it clearly
enough for anyone able to read

>
Even you admitted that Poincaré would likely have kicked you in the a**

>

Wozniak.

>
>
No, I didn't. A lie as usual.

>
You did. Amnesia now?

>
No, I didn't As you insist - maybe it's
rather a delusion than a lie. Woll, both
very possible.

>
Anyway you did.

>
Nope. As said - either a lie or a delusion.
Both typical for a relativistic idiot in general
and for you especially.
>

>

See,  - I've proven the mumble of your idiot
guru to be inconsistent, and you can do nothing about it

>
There is nothing to do as you've never done anything like.

>
>
Yes, I did, I've pointed directly 2 denying
themself predictions of his,  physics.

>
You didn't, they're laughable nonsense.

>
Of course they are, they're consequences
of the physics of your idiot guru.
>
>
>

Only you were screaming. You got precise refutations of you silly

>
Nope, I've got some utterly ridiculous
assertions, extremly stupid even considering
the usual level of the Shit's worshippers.
Well,  nothing more was ever expected, of
course. It's changing nothing, the mumble
of your idiot guru was not even consistent,
it's been proven and a fanatic piece of shit
screaming "NOOOOO!!!" spitting and slandering is
changing nothing. Sorry.

>
If it were a proof how come nobody but you recognizes it as such?

>
Nobody is expecting a bunch of
fanatic idiots to recognize and accept
a proof that their divine guru was just
a mumbling crazie.
Expecting something like that from
a bunch of brainwashed fanatics wouldn't
be wise, would it?

 A proof is a human production, right? As long as an alleged one is not considered valid by a significant community outside of its author it is not a proof.

 Sorry, poor stinker - pointing 2 denying
themself predictions of the physics of
your idiot guru is a proof of its inconsistency.
No matter whether you and your fellow trash
are accepting it or not.
 

You can insult people, it doesn't change the fact that what you have nothing like a proof.

 You can insult people, it doesn't change the
fact that I've pointed directly 2 denying
themself predictions of the physics of your
idiot guru. I.e - I've demonstrated a proof
of its inconsistency.
Now - go fuck yourself with your pseudophilosophy.
It's as worthless as The Shit of your idiot guru.

Just because *you* say so? Come on! You have demonstrated nothing. And are just a demented ranting kook lost in the middle of nowhere.