Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.1

On 05/25/2025 12:46 PM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On 21/05/2025 13:47, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
>

The diagrams also show that, relative to any frame of reference,
any particle moves into the future and in space at a speed that
is *faster than measured* in that frame (i.e. in a plane of
simultaneity) by exactly its Lorentz factor.  And this already
and essentially is **time travel**.
>
In particular, the 4-velocity of light in any frame of reference

>
Given that the *world line* of a "particle" is the
continuos line through the *individual instances*
in (proper!) time of that particle (just for some
terminology):
>
An immediate consequence of the fact that light
signals actually travel at infinite speed is that
every individual particle in this Universe must
be entangled not just with some of its neighbours
(in fact, across space and time as it turns out),
but with most (transitively) of the other instances
of the same particle along its own world line,
i.e. as soon as there are any mirrors around...
>
Where "self-entanglement along the world-line"
seems to me a good starting point for coherence
conditions for retro-causation, aka a solution
to the Twin Paradox.
>
-Julio
>

Hmm..., "retro-causation", ..., not causation?
The stochastic, or probabilistic, interpretation of
the quantum mechanics, can be seen that it's arbitrarily
fast and instantaneously evaluated everywhere the geodesy,
not necessarily that there are "random" things at all.
Though of course one may aver that will naturally
is free in the sense that contemplation and deliberation
can involve arbitrarily few involved resources physically.
The idea is to have free will, like things like the "Fourth Dimension"
and discontinuity or "random worlds" would seem to imply,
yet still have a sort of, "natural order", and not in the old
humanistic sense of might-makes-right instead that of a sort
of comfort of continuity, free will and natural order.
Light is pretty special practically and pretty uniquely, optically,
lumping it in with the rest of "electromagnetic" radiation along
with things like heat and gamma-rays, when light is neither kinetic
nor electrical itself, like radioelectric waves are electrical and
radionuclear rays are kinetic, light is its own sort feature of
physics, then it's fair to say that our eyes see the (central) range
of visible light simply as a matter of evolution, of things that
live above the Earth.