Re: Relativistic definition

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sp relativity 
Sujet : Re: Relativistic definition
De : r.hachel (at) *nospam* wanadou.fr (Richard Hachel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 24. Jul 2024, 13:28:12
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <D1zC2LIVJQmOuI_dPSRZKZCF4HY@jntp>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Nemo/0.999a
Le 24/07/2024 à 11:03, Mikko a écrit :
then their proper times will be equal."
 That sentence contains an undefined term "Galilean movement".
Therefore no agreement is possible.
 Mikko
Vous avez raison.
Il est plus précis de dire : "If two mobiles, one in simple uniform Galilean movement,
the other in uniformly accelerated movement with a start at rest,
cross an identical space, in identical observable times,
then their proper times will be equal."
However, in the current state of things, it is forbidden to write this on your exam sheet, to avoid getting zero.
Physicists don't mess with trolls, cranks, bandits and thugs. :))
R.H.
Date Sujet#  Auteur
23 Jul 24 * Relativistic definition9Richard Hachel
23 Jul 24 +* Re: Relativistic definition5JanPB
24 Jul 24 i`* Re: Relativistic definition4Richard Hachel
24 Jul 24 i `* Re: Relativistic definition3Paul.B.Andersen
24 Jul 24 i  `* Re: Relativistic definition2Richard Hachel
24 Jul 24 i   `- Re: Relativistic definition1Elick Tzagadaev
24 Jul 24 `* Re: Relativistic definition3Mikko
24 Jul 24  `* Re: Relativistic definition2Richard Hachel
26 Jul 24   `- Re: Relativistic definition1Mikko

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal