Sujet : Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity."
De : ross.a.finlayson (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Ross Finlayson)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 11. Jan 2025, 06:39:40
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <OZydnWNNIqODmR_6nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
On 01/10/2025 02:42 PM, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 10.01.2025 o 21:08, Ross Finlayson pisze:
>
>
Leon has an interesting section in his free pdf book "Apparent
Relativity" on the laws of logic and relativity.
>
In reality the principle of Relativity is merely
a negative assertion "motion is relative not absolute"
>
>
Right, The Shit is merely an assertion.
Later on, of course, the term "confirm"
was redefined to make it "confirmed".
>
There _is_ space contraction and what's involved
is "Zero-eth laws of motion" and _classical mechanics_
and under-definition in _classical mechanics_, then
that as with regards to Equivalence Principle and
gravity and G-forces, those being different, and,
the aether _not_ existing, makes way for why
the relativistic effects of _charged_ particles
are as observed, while, GR is in _front_ of SR,
with regards to mechanics.
Yes, there are definite contrivances with regards
to "the perfect balance" where various assumptions
of various extensions of "Relativity Theory" itself,
as what are contrived. Yet, space contraction is
quite real, merely various in the matter, electricity,
and the nuclear, as according to the most usual
observable, optical light.