Re: Langevin's paradox again

Le 15/07/2024 à 20:14, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :

 I can only give you the answer according to SR.
You will find all the equations and the method to
solve the problem here:
https://paulba.no/pdf/TwinsByMetric.pdf

 Lots of interesting things, but a lot of things repeated from what relativists say, and which is not a personal thought.
This is all very interesting but it is difficult to have an honest and coherent discussion on this for several reasons.
The first being that the position of the relativists is today a matter of dogma, almost in the same way as Christian or Muslim dogmas. I agree on some things (I'm not a crank who denies everything), but I disagree on others.
It is very difficult today to attack the SR, even partially, even with enormous arguments. SR has apparently become more of a faith than a science, and this is not normal.
It becomes almost impossible to correct errors that are however clear, even if only in the correct explanation of Langevin. The SR is totally incoherent in the face of Hachel who will protest by saying that the apparent speeds are contradictory if we do not apply the notion of reciprocity of relativistic effects on lengths AND DISTANCES, which will explain why OBSERVABLE speeds instantaneous are incorrect, and why the use of real speeds brings a lot of understanding to the whole, which will also explain that the metric of rotating frames of reference is abstract and completely false.
But I repeat it clearly, the problem is human, and even in the face of theoretical evidence, humans will still say "it is impossible that I am wrong".
R.H.