Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c²

On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 11:44:39 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:

Den 03.10.2024 02:55, skrev rhertz:

<snip>

Even using Minkowski, AS OF TODAY the expression:
>
t-vx/c²
>
couldn't be EXPLAINED AS IF IT POSSESSES THE MEREST PHYSICAL MEANING.

>
The Lorentz transform describes SR completely.
It's meaning is that it predicts a lot of physical
consequences which are observed in the real world,
and which are not predicted by Newtonian mechanics
and Galilean relativity.
>
SR is thoroughly tested by a innumerable experiments
and observations and is never falsified.

<snip>
And yet in another proof of your ignorance, fanaticism and brainwashing
on relativity, YOU HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO GIVE ANY EXPLANATION ABOUT
-vx/c², EITHER WITH A PHYSICAL MEANING OR EVEN A METAPHYSICAL ONE.
That is because you're an idiot who bought the relativity package of
crap WITHOUT a mere question on its ARTIFICIAL STRUCTURE.
Give an explanation about the PHYSICAL MEANING of -vx/c² in "local time"
OR shut your mouth (or equivalent).
Cornered relativistic rat.