Re: Relativistic synchronisation method

Le 31/12/2024 à 11:40, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

 And you may be absolutely sure it's never
going to show "local time" absurd invented
by your idiot guru.

Newtonian physicists (they are called cranks because they no longer exist in laboratories or very few) make two mistakes, where Einsteinian physicists only make one.
Only Dr. Hachel (that's me) does not make either of these two mistakes.
The first mistake of Newtonians is to consider that time is ubiquitous. They consider that when it is December 31, 2024, it is December 31, 2024 everywhere in the universe, and that tomorrow, the entire universe will move to January 1, 2025. They do not understand the relativity of the notion of local simultaneity. They do not understand the notion of universal ANISOCHRONY.
Certainly, there is, at this very moment, in my hyperplane of simultaneity, a moment that corresponds to my present time, over there, on Tau Ceti (12 light-years from Earth). If I drop a marble, maybe at the same present moment over there, a comet has just crashed into one of the moons of its solar system, and I can affirm that the events were simultaneous (FOR ME).
But this simultaneity is mine, it is not reciprocal. An observer placed over there, in this inatant (for me) perceives very well that a comet has just crashed. But the event "my marble has just fallen to the ground" does not exist for him. It will only exist in 24 years (breathe, blow). And no one will be able to do anything about it at all. I cannot prevent my marble from falling, and he cannot prevent (notion of causality) that in his future (24 years!!!), he will perceive the fall of my marble, 24 years after he perceived the shock of the comet in his system.
That is the first error.
Physicists do the same, and are completely overwhelmed when I talk to them about it.
The second mistake of Newtonians is to consider that chronotropy (the measurement of time) is invariant, and does not depend on the speed of the frame of reference that takes the measurements. At least, since Poincaré, leading physicists no longer make this mistake.
R.H.