Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of The Shit

On Fri, 30 Aug 2024 4:07:47 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 30.08.2024 o 05:01, gharnagel pisze:

>
On Thu, 29 Aug 2024 21:06:07 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
[Lies, slanders, insults and nonsense deleted]

>
All lies, of course, concocted by fundamentally
dishonest and incompetent Wozzie-liar.  Wozzie
is a very sick soul.  Apparently, he's addicted
to an endorphin boost by arguing, insulting,
lying and slandering.  He can go pound sand.

>
>
Screaming "NOOOOOOO!!!!" and stamping feet
won't help, the proof won't go away, the
mumble of your idiot guru was not even
consistent. Sorry, trash.

Stupid, ignoramus Wozzie-fool believes he "wins" by
being the last poster, so he cuts and pastes his past
idiocies.  This is his typical infantile behavior.
Also typical is his lying, delusional assertions that
he has "proven" relativity is inconsistent.
He hasn't.  He has fabricated an insane fable that is
of full holes and everyone laughs at.  Here is the OP:
"an observer moving with c/2 wrt solar system is
measuring the length of solar day. What is the
result predicted by the Einsteinian physics?
One prediction is - 99766. From the postulates.
The second prediction is - 86400. From definition."
In subsequent posts, he waffles and says no measurement
was made, and then he tries to assert that relativity
makes the two "predictions", and then he waffles about
.. well, just about everything.  Then he yells and
screams that he is being insulted and slandered when
his house of cards is demolished by cold, hard facts.
And he denies reality when confronted by the cold,
hard facts and claims that all experimental evidence
is fabricated.  He is just projecting his own duplicity
in fabricating a bogus fable in the first place.
In the first place, a definition is not a prediction.
He seems to believe that the moving observer is
justified in using the definition as a second "prediction"
which is ludicrous.  In the second place, definitions
have only limited value in physics.  When evidence
shows that they are wrong in certain situations, they
no longer apply.
Consequently, the "definition" must be replaced by an
observer on earth making a measurement.  So we allow
that he measures the earth day as 86400 seconds.
So the moving observer "measures" the day as 99766
seconds, and the earth observer measures 86400 seconds.
This is exactly what SR predicts, and all the experimental
evidence supports this prediction.  Wozniak then calls the
the experimental evidence false to support his house of
cards fable, which is veritable insanity.  He is in denial
of reality and should consider being institutionalized.