Re: the notion of counter-intuitiveness in relativistic physics

On Sat, 10 Aug 2024 16:42:55 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 10.08.2024 o 18:27, gharnagel pisze:

>
Yep, I often give him the benefit of the doubt and give him either
option.  It's a conundrum to determine which one is worse.  If he's
a liar AND God exists, then he goes to hell.  So it's better to be
stupid.  OTOH, if God doesn't exist, it's worse to be stupid.

>
It's amusing that such a piece of lying
shit is believing  God, you know.

Wozzie is projecting again :-))

Sure, Harrie, your lies won't be punished cause
you're lying for a just cause.

No such thing.  Wozzie is projecting again, believing
HIS lies are in a "just" cause.

How about your lie of GPS clocks readings?
When reading of the one from Earth will be
2024-08-31 17:00:00,000000000-  what will
be the reading of the one from the
satellite? Numbers, please.
>
Still no answer, Harrie? Of course.

I answered, but Walnut-brain Wozzie is too stupid
to understand.  He's dissembling again, asking what
the reading FROM the satellite is, not the reading
AT the satellite.  There's no one there to read it,
but even Wozzie knows the answer: it won't agree
with what was received on earth (unless it was read
at the time that the clock was updated FROM earth).
Wozzie proves once again that he's not an engineer,
because engineers would understand when something
was engineered.  He's only a greasy monkey.