Re: No evidence

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sp relativity 
Sujet : Re: No evidence
De : hitlong (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 18. Sep 2024, 23:05:45
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <ffddeca475567ea6131fbccea2d318b6@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Wed, 18 Sep 2024 14:09:59 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
W dniu 18.09.2024 o 15:15, gharnagel pisze:
>
On Wed, 18 Sep 2024 12:49:07 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
[Unbelievably stupid ranting response deleted by
sanitation engineers (who are rational, unlike
"information" engineers)]
>
Wozzie-liar makes no sane sense, as expected from
his previous dishonest posts designed, apparently,
to keep his ego stroked by seeing his name in print.
No further response to his vacuous rants is necessary.
>
See, poor trash - I've proven the mumble of your idiot
guru to be inconsistent,
Repeating a refuted assertion doesn't make it true, neither
do insults and pasted lies.

and you can do nothing about it apart of spitting,
insulting and slandering.
I've presented solid evidence that Wozniak's assertions
are completely false.  Since he has serious mental issues,
he will do what he can for his beloved coprophilia and
his beloved satanic Church of What Never Happened.  His
liturgy:
"Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience
seared with a hot iron" -- 1 Tim 4:2
"A true witness delivereth souls: but a deceitful witness
speaketh lies." -- Proverbs 14:25
"And they will deceive every one his neighbour, and
will not speak the truth: they have taught their tongue
to speak lies"
Whereas the Church of What Really Happens has in its
liturgy such truths as
https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2010/09/nist-pair-aluminum-atomic-clocks-reveal-einsteins-relativity-personal-scale
"NIST scientists performed the new "time dilation" experiments by
comparing operations of a pair of the world's best experimental
atomic clocks. The nearly identical clocks are each based on the
"ticking" of a single aluminum ion (electrically charged atom)
as it vibrates between two energy levels over a million billion
times per second."
"In one set of experiments, scientists raised one of the clocks
by jacking up the laser table to a height one-third of a meter
(about a foot) above the second clock. Sure enough, the higher
clock ran at a slightly faster rate than the lower clock,
exactly as predicted."
"The second set of experiments examined the effects of altering
the physical motion of the ion in one clock. (The ions are almost
completely motionless during normal clock operations.) NIST
scientists tweaked the one ion so that it gyrated back and forth
at speeds equivalent to several meters per second. That clock
ticked at a slightly slower rate than the second clock, as
predicted by relativity."
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-04349-7
https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.12238
"we measure a linear frequency gradient consistent with the
gravitational redshift within a single millimetre-scale sample
of ultracold strontium. Our result is enabled by improving the
fractional frequency measurement uncertainty by more than a
factor of 10, now reaching 7.6 × 10−21."
http://www.leapsecond.com/history/Ashby-Relativity.htm
 "A frequency synthesizer was built into the satellite clock
system so that after launch, if in fact the rate of the clock in
its final orbit was that predicted by GR, then the synthesizer
could be turned on bringing the clock to the coordinate rate
necessary for operation. The atomic clock was first operated for
about 20 days to measure its clock rate before turning on the
synthesizer. The frequency measured during that interval was
+442.5 parts in 1012 faster than clocks on the ground; if left
uncorrected this would have resulted in timing errors of about
38,000 nanoseconds per day." -- Neil Ashby
https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/experiments.html
Bailey et al., "Measurements of relativistic time
dilation for positive and negative muons in a
circular orbit," Nature 268 (July 28, 1977) pg 301.
Bailey et al., Nuclear Physics B 150 pg 1–79 (1979).
Sherwin, "Some Recent Experimental Tests of the 'Clock
Paradox'", Phys. Rev. 129 no. 1 (1960), pg 17.
Bender et al., Science 182 (1973), pg 229.  "The corner
reflectors placed on the moon by the Apollo astronauts
are used to verify GR with a net accuracy of 15 cm in
the telescope-to-reflector distance."
So Wozniak's Church of What Never Happened insists that thousands of
scientists are lying, but The Church of What Really Happens includes
Occam's Razor, which shaves off Deceitful Wozniak's lies and reveals
the simple truth: Wozniak is a satanic liar.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
13 Sep 24 * Re: No evidence39LaurenceClarkCrossen
13 Sep 24 +* Re: No evidence2gharnagel
14 Sep 24 i`- Re: No evidence1LaurenceClarkCrossen
14 Sep 24 `* Re: No evidence36Mikko
15 Sep 24  +* Re: No evidence5LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Sep 24  i+- Re: No evidence1LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Sep 24  i`* Re: No evidence3Mikko
15 Sep 24  i +- Re: No evidence1Maciej Wozniak
15 Sep 24  i `- Re: No evidence1LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Sep 24  `* Re: No evidence30LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Sep 24   +* Re: No evidence11gharnagel
15 Sep 24   i+* Re: No evidence9LaurenceClarkCrossen
16 Sep 24   ii`* Re: No evidence8gharnagel
16 Sep 24   ii +- Re: No evidence (rotating frames)1Ross Finlayson
16 Sep 24   ii `* Re: No evidence6gharnagel
18 Sep 24   ii  `* Re: No evidence5gharnagel
18 Sep 24   ii   `* Re: No evidence4gharnagel
18 Sep 24   ii    `* Re: No evidence3gharnagel
20 Sep 24   ii     `* Re: No evidence2gharnagel
20 Sep 24   ii      `- Re: No evidence1Maciej Wozniak
16 Sep 24   i`- Re: No evidence1gharnagel
15 Sep 24   `* Re: No evidence18Mikko
15 Sep 24    +- Re: No evidence1Maciej Wozniak
15 Sep 24    +* Re: No evidence4LaurenceClarkCrossen
17 Sep 24    i`* Re: No evidence3Mikko
17 Sep 24    i +- Re: No evidence1LaurenceClarkCrossen
20 Sep 24    i `- Re: No evidence1Thomas Heger
15 Sep 24    +* Re: No evidence5LaurenceClarkCrossen
17 Sep 24    i`* Re: No evidence4Mikko
17 Sep 24    i `* Re: No evidence3Richard Hachel
19 Sep 24    i  `* Re: No evidence2Mikko
19 Sep 24    i   `- Re: No evidence1Richard Hachel
15 Sep 24    `* Re: No evidence7LaurenceClarkCrossen
16 Sep 24     +- Re: No evidence1gharnagel
16 Sep 24     +- Re: No evidence1LaurenceClarkCrossen
17 Sep 24     `* Re: No evidence4Mikko
17 Sep 24      `* Re: No evidence3LaurenceClarkCrossen
19 Sep 24       `* Re: No evidence2Mikko
19 Sep 24        `- Re: No evidence1Maciej Wozniak

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal