Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!

On 11/22/2024 01:03 PM, rhertz wrote:

On Fri, 22 Nov 2024 20:30:39 +0000, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
>
<snip all the history of your life. You didn't read my disclaimer>
>
>

Bottom line:
It doesn't matter how you put energy into a closed cavity.
In the cavity there will be a black body radiation with
temperature equal to the temperature of the walls.
>
The reflectivity, albedo or colour of the inner surface
of the cavity are irrelevant. The radiation in the cavity
will always be black body radiation.
>
Make a hole in your cavity, and you have a perfect
black body radiation source.
>
Its temperature will not be very high, though-
>

>
Now smile, asshole.

>
:-D

>
It is not a BB radiation source!
>
You ignored the fact that the heat goes away from the cavity. It doesn't
remain neither inside nor outside. It's eliminated by cooling
mechanisms, as I wrote as an initial condition. Read all the posts.
>
There is no light energy left within the cavity, nor heat energy outside
it. You better think again about it.
>
You also ignored my post apologizing to all people that participated in
this thread. That makes you a bigger ASSHOLE than what I thought.
>
Now, start thinking in my NEXT IDEA:
>
Willing to try to prove/disprove E=mc² at a macroscopic level, I'll
think of an experiment that incorporates electromagnetic oscillations
passing through the cavity, which will be converted in a CAPACITOR, by
cutting it in halves and isolating them with a thin ring.
>
What I propose to MEASURE is the changes in the frequency of the LC
oscillator, within a time window of about 3 msec, which repeats
permanently.
>
I'll use a relationship between mass and capacitance for the cavity,
with frequency around 1 Mhz or greater.
>
>
It was a failed idea for an experiment, but there are OTHER WAYS to
check E=mc² at a macroscopic level, without resorting to nuclear energy
crap (Kg evaporated vs. energy provided), or else.
>
Ask ChatGPT:
>
>
any other non-relativistic means to prove E=mc^2?
or
Is there any way to prove E=mc^2 at higher level than quantum?
or
can I use electrostatic energy?
>
>
The last one gave interesting insights. Ask to it sequentially the above
lines.
>
>
>
Keep smiling, asshole.

In more civil times we'd just say, "see you later, alligator",
then the other fellow would say, "in a while, crocodile".
Swearing was considered something trash did,
or perhaps someone who just stubbed themselves.
Toss your prayer-booth this "super-imposed neutral linac
and charged cyclotron, measuring while switching on
and off, each" and see what results. Here if I posed it
to the large language model, then I'd also prompt it
reasons what to provide the configuration and energy
of experiment, and have here a book detailing the
principles of construction.
This is where Einstein's second-mass famous mass-energy
equivalence derivation arrives at this from fundamentally
different principles for the nominally (at least) non-linear
and furthermore the formally rotating, setting.
And some people even dare to think that "infinity"
isn't a natural unit, ....