Re: Spacetime

On 07/20/2024 12:20 PM, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

W dniu 20.07.2024 o 20:57, gharnagel pisze:

On Sat, 20 Jul 2024 16:36:31 +0000, Ross Finlayson wrote:

>
On 07/20/2024 06:04 AM, gharnagel wrote:

>
Are we getting closer to a TOE?

>
"A Theory", a theory at all.
>
Of course it has to work with all the data of all the
scientific experiments of all time.

>
Aye, there's the rub.

>
And, of course, it can ignore the reality, as it
is not scientific.
>

No, no, no no no, the theory: must be a true theory,
that there is one at all then there's the teleological
side, which some mathematical platonists call the
theory of logical and mathematical relation that exists
to be discovered, and the phenomenological side, of which
our scientific method and philosophy makes for us
a science.
I.e. "it", can not, "ignore", the theory, nor the data.
Now, it's key to consider that there's a complement to
the phenomenological of the merely sensual and the
apparatus of detectors in the sampling/measurement/observation,
that being detecting an event, measuring it, and measuring
it over time, where all events are the things and the things
are the events, in time-series data, that a complement to
the merely sensual is an "object sense", which includes only
a few things, a "word sense", a "number sense", a "time sense",
and a sense of "the continuum", so that we can equip the
model physicists, who is blind mentally except for the
phenomenological and the play-book of the theory, equip
the model physicist with a merest "object sense", so that
numbers including "the continuum" and "infinity" as objects
of reason, then can be attached to universals of the physical
theory, as universals of the mental theory of the faculties
of the reasoning.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GSL4s9tpgBo&list=PLb7rLSBiE7F5_h5sSsWDQmbNGsmm97Fy5&index=21
A "Theory of Everything" has to first be a "mathematical
theory of everything".