Re: Why a time of the real world must be galilean

Le 11/12/2024 à 21:29, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 11.12.2024 o 20:17, Python pisze:

Le 11/12/2024 à 08:17, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 10.12.2024 o 20:45, Python pisze:

Le 10/12/2024 à 20:20, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

...

How do you practically check your "t = t'" equations for clocks standing next to each other?

>
I read the numbers they display and I compare them.

>
Good.
>

Then for distant mutually at rest clocks with no

gravity involved?

>
I don't.

>
Sad. You don't. You can't. We can.

>
No you can't either. Sorry, There is a small technical detail: those
"distant clocks" are not moving wrt each
other.
How do you ensure that? By assuming the
condition a priori;and you can do it because
you're only applying your procedure
in your gedanken. Am I incorrect ?

 You are. I put two clocks at the extremity of a rod.

 Yeah, sure - "distant" clocks  at the
extremity of the rod - very practical
indeed, isn't it?
    This is quite

reasonable to assume they are at rest wrt to each other, isn't it?

 No. Take 2 bodies - one orbitting the other.
Join them with a rod, do you secure their relative
immobility ? Yeah, you imagined and insisted
Gdańsk and Warsaw aren't moving wrt each other. You're
such an idiot.

What is the relative speed between Gdansk and Warsaw then?

You're only believing [into] a great
practical procedure - because your is pumping you with gedanken fairy
tales where it works fine.

 Nope. If such a procedure would fail it could be checked.

 How could it fail if you  have never used it.
 

No magic, and if gravity could not be ignored in a given practical setup

 So, where, precisely, was your [method]
applied. In practice.

I asked for yours, if you had answered I would have explained mine. Unfortunately you've only shown how to check if a clock is in synch with itself :-))))) At least you were right then :-))))
I notice that you've chickened out, snipped most of my post, and provide only idiotic comment.
As usual :-D

--
poor stinker, idiot

Nice signature. Concise and adequate.